Author Topic: Newest AMD vs intel i7  (Read 2195 times)

Offline 2bighorn

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2829
Re: Newest AMD vs intel i7
« Reply #30 on: April 02, 2012, 01:29:07 PM »
Memory Limit in 64-bit Windows

User-mode virtual address space for each 32-bit process:
2 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWAR E cleared (default)
4 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWAR E set

User-mode virtual address space for each 64-bit process:
8 TB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWAR E set (default)
2 GB with IMAGE_FILE_LARGE_ADDRESS_AWAR E cleared

Kernel-mode virtual address space:
8TB
 

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Re: Newest AMD vs intel i7
« Reply #31 on: April 02, 2012, 02:04:11 PM »
The virtual address space is not the physical address space.

The following table specifies the limits on physical memory for Windows 7.
Version32 bit64 bit
Ultimate4GB192GB
Enterprise4GB192GB
Professional4GB192GB
Home Premium4GB16GB
Home Basic4GB8GB
Starter2GBN/A

The process size numbers you have are correct.  My bad for not looking and going from memory.  Thank you.

Here is the public link to Microsoft's MSDN page explaining  the various memory configurations.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2012, 02:08:45 PM by Skuzzy »
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline 2bighorn

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2829
Re: Newest AMD vs intel i7
« Reply #32 on: April 02, 2012, 02:49:04 PM »
The virtual address space is not the physical address space.

I know, I listed virtual address space because discussion went into application/process memory limit on windows, which I think is more relevant than physical memory limit.

Anyway, current desktop hardware limits are even lower - typical 32GB (or less) for Intel CPU platform.

Offline Hamltnblue

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 428
Re: Newest AMD vs intel i7
« Reply #33 on: April 02, 2012, 03:41:26 PM »
I believe the 4GB in the 32 bit versions includes the video memory. So if you have 4Gig of ram you will only get 3Gig and change used.

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: Newest AMD vs intel i7
« Reply #34 on: April 04, 2012, 10:24:14 AM »
it looks like AMD will be releasing a FX-4200 processor which features 4 cores and 4 modules (no shared integer modules in this one). This CPU could be pretty decent for Aces high I reckon !
now posting as SirNuke

Offline cattb

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1163
Re: Newest AMD vs intel i7
« Reply #35 on: April 04, 2012, 04:18:48 PM »
AMD has  fx 4270, have not seen any reviews.
:Salute Easy8 EEK GUS Betty

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: Newest AMD vs intel i7
« Reply #36 on: April 05, 2012, 12:43:48 AM »
it looks like AMD will be releasing a FX-4200 processor which features 4 cores and 4 modules (no shared integer modules in this one). This CPU could be pretty decent for Aces high I reckon !

only info i found out about that is this  http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012032801_AMD_FX-4200_spotted_in_Gigabyte_support_list.html



semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: Newest AMD vs intel i7
« Reply #37 on: April 05, 2012, 06:19:57 AM »
it looks like AMD will be releasing a FX-4200 processor which features 4 cores and 4 modules (no shared integer modules in this one). This CPU could be pretty decent for Aces high I reckon !

I meant floating point and not integer...

only info i found out about that is this  http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2012/2012032801_AMD_FX-4200_spotted_in_Gigabyte_support_list.html



semp

yeah I've seen various reports, but no test yet
now posting as SirNuke