Shouldnt burning hangers burn GVs?

[jarbo]

Just seems to me that a hanger thats on fire should kill a GV in it.

[Max]

Makes sense to me.

[Bizman]

If the GV crew were Finns, they'd just undress inside the tank and throw some water on the hottest spot for some nice sauna bathing.

[icepac]

Heaters gotta heat.

[matt]

makes sence how ever 70 ton tanks flip in this game if you hit a bush.

[crazyivan]

If the GV crew were Finns, they'd just undress inside the tank and throw some water on the hottest spot for some nice sauna bathing.

Throw in some Vodka and some fannie towel slapping would ensue.

[Daddkev]

  I just threw up a little!!! 

[Raphael]

use combustible lemons

[PFactorDave]

makes sence how ever 70 ton tanks flip in this game if you hit a bush.

Need to equip some B29s with a load of shrubbery and drop that instead of bombs!

[uptown]

 

[Ruah]

smart fruit!!

[TheMercinary60]

Need to equip some B29s with a load of shrubbery and drop that instead of bombs!

sounds good enough for the wish list to me

[Yeager]

Maybe when they start modeling fatigue, decay (engine, barrel degradation), random gun jams.......stuff like that.

[Slate]

   Just pretend the GV came out of a non burning hanger. You know how to pretend don't you? 

[W7LPNRICK]

No! I like to park my wirble inside the fire to shoot from, seems to make you harder to see...almost never get bomb****ed there.