Author Topic: Cannon Fighter Concept  (Read 863 times)

Offline tunnelrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Cannon Fighter Concept
« on: June 20, 2012, 03:20:55 PM »
Very interesting read, tying in World War 2 concepts with modern day warfare trends:

http://www.combatreform.org/cannonfighter.htm

In-Game: 80hd
The Spartans do not enquire how many the enemy are but where they are.

Offline Rich52

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 868
Re: Cannon Fighter Concept
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2012, 03:31:38 PM »
Nice find.
Yes, your on "Ignore"

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Cannon Fighter Concept
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2012, 04:14:34 PM »
Cool read, but I think the article takes things a bit too far in terms of "We can't fight a war!!!!!!" mentality.

Really, we have trouble fighting a limited war, and a counter-guerilla/insurgent war. But the same is true for just about everyone. By their very nature, guerilla fighters are going to be the most annoying/difficult to eliminate enemy, EVER, regardless of who you are and what equipment you're using.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Jabberwock

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 102
Re: Cannon Fighter Concept
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2012, 11:26:52 PM »
Very interesting read, tying in World War 2 concepts with modern day warfare trends:

http://www.combatreform.org/cannonfighter.htm


Arrrrgh, run for your lives, its a Sparky site!  :bolt:

For those of you that don't know, Mike Sparks is the military equivalent of the Time Cube. You have been warned  :noid


Offline R 105

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 978
Re: Cannon Fighter Concept
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2012, 06:15:46 AM »
 I think we have a winner for the anti tank aircraft I see people wishing for here in the forums. I have seen wishes for the HS-129 and other under powered planes but not the Mosquito with a 6 ponder in it's nose or if I did I don't recall it. Now there is a ground attack aircraft I would like to see in the game.   

Offline tunnelrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: Cannon Fighter Concept
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2012, 09:04:36 AM »
Arrrrgh, run for your lives, its a Sparky site!  :bolt:

For those of you that don't know, Mike Sparks is the military equivalent of the Time Cube. You have been warned  :noid



I am unfamiliar with his other work(s), but I wholeheartedly agree that larger caliber HE-cannon armed fighters vs. the pillboxes on Omaha Beach could have enormously altered the outcome of that engagement.

I searched the Time Cube reference... AWESOME.


 
In-Game: 80hd
The Spartans do not enquire how many the enemy are but where they are.

Offline Jabberwock

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 102
Re: Cannon Fighter Concept
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2012, 08:59:23 PM »
Given that the German casemates and pillboxes were generally resistant to direct 4"-5"/105-127 mm fire from destroyers and the indirect 8"-12"/203-305 mm fire from cruisers, I question whether 56-75 mm fire from aircraft was going to have any effect.

Offline tunnelrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: Cannon Fighter Concept
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2012, 10:05:00 AM »
Given that the German casemates and pillboxes were generally resistant to direct 4"-5"/105-127 mm fire from destroyers and the indirect 8"-12"/203-305 mm fire from cruisers, I question whether 56-75 mm fire from aircraft was going to have any effect.

Cannon armed fighters would have a much easier time of putting HE rounds inside the wall-to-wall view ports than ships miles out to sea.

In-Game: 80hd
The Spartans do not enquire how many the enemy are but where they are.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Cannon Fighter Concept
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2012, 11:11:35 AM »
Easier, but not nessicarily an easy time. And a B-25H or a Mossie would be easier to shoot down than a P-47 ripple-firing rockets at the pillboxes and bunkers.


Really, a salvo of HVAR's would be just as, if not more, effective as a few 57mm or 75mm HE shells lobbed at the general area of the firing slits, not to mention safer for the attacking.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"