Author Topic: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II  (Read 501 times)

Offline tuton25

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« on: June 11, 2012, 10:21:49 PM »
As the idea stands for nation division: Japan/Germany/Italy England/Russia America
Map rotaion will be every six weeks (one week equals one year)
Based on the criticisms I've seen I think I've thought of a few ways to balance things out and fix problems:
1) American air would dominate because the other sides lack good heavy bombers
A1) Add planes:
HE-111
DO-17
HE-177
DO-217
Handley Page Halifax
Short Stirling
Bristol Beufighter
A2) Larger formations (i.e. 5 planes) of medium bombers
A3)Limit the number of heavy bombers that a person can use
**********
2)England/Russia lack esscort fighters
A1) Add Planes:
Boulton Paul defiant
Westland Whirlwind
**********
3)America will dominate the seas
A1)Add planes:
Fairey Firefly
Fairey Swordfish
HE-115
A2) Add more ships/AA to lacking nations
4)People will not like that they are forced to fly certain planes
A1)The arenas will be set-up like this:
WW1
Latewar MA
Evolution arena
Help/Training
Dualing
Axis Vs Allies
Special Event
**********
><))))*> Da Fish is in Da Fight

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2012, 10:27:31 PM »
Still -1. Go fly a scenario.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2012, 10:35:56 PM »
as said scenario
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2012, 10:45:02 PM »
As the idea stands for nation division: Japan/Germany/Italy England/Russia America
Map rotaion will be every six weeks (one week equals one year)
Based on the criticisms I've seen I think I've thought of a few ways to balance things out and fix problems:
1) American air would dominate because the other sides lack good heavy bombers
A1) Add planes:
HE-111
DO-17
HE-177
DO-217
Handley Page Halifax
Short Stirling
Bristol Beufighter
The He111, Do17, Stirling and Beaufighter (a fighter-bomber, not a bomber, FYI) would do nothing at all for balance in this category.  The Halifax is essentially identical in capability to the Lancaster and so adds nothing.  The Do217 (and Ju188 that you didn't mention) are good solid medium bombers and the He177 is a wildcard, but likely a decent heavy bomber.  Conclusion:  The British and Russians are just as doomed as they were before.  The Germans, Italians and Japanese situation has improved.
Quote
A2) Larger formations (i.e. 5 planes) of medium bombers
A3)Limit the number of heavy bombers that a person can use
Because these would affect all sides it does not change the balance.
Quote
**********
2)England/Russia lack esscort fighters
A1) Add Planes:
Boulton Paul defiant
Westland Whirlwind
**********
I have no idea why you would suggest either of those as escort fighters.  They are both short ranged and poor performing early war fighters.  The Defiant in particular would be helpless to defend itself let alone anything else.  The only things you would really add here would be the Mosquito Mk 30 and perhaps the Yak-9D, though the the -9D still only had 845 miles of range.  While the Mosquito Mk 30 was a good twin engined, high altitude fighter, I wouldn't care to tangle with Bf109Ks, P-47Ns and Ta152s with it too much.
Quote
3)America will dominate the seas
A1)Add planes:
Fairey Firefly
Fairey Swordfish
HE-115
The Firefly would be helpful to the British/Russians, but the Swordfish would be neigh useless with the B5N2 being vastly superior.  They still would still urgently need the Seafire L.Mk III and, if you want to loosen the rules, Seafire Mk XV.  The Axis get absolutely nothing out of the He115 as it would be nothing more than a flying target.  The B7A2 and D4Y would give the Axis more comparable strike aircraft but nothing can be done for them fighterwise unless the rules are grossly loosened and the A7M2 added (good luck on getting accurate performance data for the A7M2).

As we are done with the plane section of your post I'll add the note that you do not seem to have any idea what many of the aircraft you are naming actually are.
Quote
A2) Add more ships/AA to lacking nations
As long as historical guns and ships are used nothing can be done to help the Axis here.  Without proximity fuses, which they never had, their defenses will be weak.  The British would bring the proximity fuses to their side (they were am American and Canadian development).
4)People will not like that they are forced to fly certain planes
Quote
A1)The arenas will be set-up like this:
WW1
Latewar MA
Evolution arena
Help/Training
Dualing
Axis Vs Allies
Special Event
**********
Without more description I annot comment on this.

You also left out the bit about the Axis utterly dominating on the ground.  The British Germans are so-so on tanks with the Sherman VC 'Firefly' and T-34/85, but completely lack any AA vehicle.  The Americans are doomed with only the M4A3(75) and M4A3(76) for tanks and weak in AA with the M16.  The Axis Panther V G, Tiger I and especially Tiger II would be nigh unstoppable.  Wirbelwinds and Ostwinds as AA vehicles just rubs salt in the wounds.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2012, 12:19:12 AM »
Karnak,

He dosen't understand why the 3 country LWMA works.

He is breaking the prime directive for making 3 countries in an unrestricted madhouse work.

The equal ability to wage war at all times.

Subject to modifiers in place to control side imbalancing.

Either everyone has the exact same toys on all three sides or players will migrate to the country with the toys with speed and big guns. Or just log off until their favorite toys are available in a format they feel they have a reasonable chance to us it in. He is trying to fit a 3 legged purple people eater into a 2 legged person's leotard. Or, he's trying to force a 2 sided war centric game methodology onto a game he doesnt understand and is obviously unhappy with. And after such a short time playing in it.

Didn't Hitech say "No" to this thing's 6 eyed twin about 5 years ago in the General Discussion forum?
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2012, 12:18:48 PM »
     He has not been fond of rolling plane sets as long as I can remember.
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8081
Re: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2012, 12:46:28 PM »
Sorry to say, tuton, it's an idea that has been proven out that it just doesn't work.  Every once in a while the subject surfaces, typically a new guy that thinks it would be a neat idea, but occasionally an older time player who is vainly holding onto the idea that this time, it will really work!

Legend has it an RPS was tried in either AH or Warbirds 10 or 15 years ago.  There was a golden age of about 2 weeks, then people realized the shortcomings, and it became unpopular and the numbers left, never to return.

This is what I've heard from the geezers that were there for it that have anything to say about it.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17934
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2012, 02:44:17 PM »
....and figure 3-6 months to add each plane, it should be ready sometime in 2025  :devil

Offline HighTone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1299
      • Squad Site
Re: Battlefield Evolution Mk.II
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2012, 04:34:08 PM »
The day I log on to the MA and can not take a Japanese plane due to some new rolling plane/country thing.... Is the day I log forever.

AvA, Snapshots, FSO's and Scenarios are in place for these types of things. Try them, I love them, they are a blast.  :cheers:

LCA Special Events CO     LCA ~Tainan Kokutai~       
www.lcasquadron.org      Thanks for the Oscar HTC