Author Topic: he129 please  (Read 662 times)

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
he129 please
« on: August 20, 2012, 02:28:34 PM »
he129 please and more tanks O and a PBY :aok

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: he129 please
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2012, 02:52:53 PM »
he129 please and more tanks O and a PBY :aok

Henschel Hs 129 ??

Hs 129 B1 - Mk 101
Hs 129 B2 - Mk 101\Mk 103
Hs 129 B3 - Bk3.7\Bk7.5

 When it was used from beneath an Hs 129's central fuselage as a ventral gun pod-mounted anti-tank weapon, the Mk-101's tungsten-cored AP round was capable of penetrating the turret and side armor of the Soviet KV-1 heavy tank.[1] An electrically-fired version of the MK 101 cannon was later developed and designated the MK 103.

If we got this thing(Hs 129) it would almost be cause for a new tab in the hanger (Tank Attack) or (GV Attack).

(Tank Attack)
IL2
Ju87G
Hs129
FW190F8
HurriIID

Additional aircraft if GV Attack name used for the tab.

(GV Attack)
Me110G
Me410
P47D25\40\N
P38L
P39
Typhoon
A20G
B25H
Typhoon
Yak9T
Spit16 : 2-250lb + 1-500lb
HurriIIC : 2-500lb
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline RngFndr

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
Re: he129 please
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2012, 06:36:39 PM »
Didn't they put an actual PAK40 in a gondola under a JU88??
Single shot with a loader crewman like a B25 howitzer..
Or is my memory failing??

And the flight performance of the JU88 was way better than
the 129..  But the 129 was armored like a Sturmovik..

That would be the schizznits as a tank killer, for sure!

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: he129 please
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2012, 05:17:45 PM »
yup hs 129:) :aok