Author Topic: Strat suggestion  (Read 453 times)

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Strat suggestion
« Reply #15 on: October 03, 2012, 09:21:57 PM »
Hitech-

I think having more strategic targets to bomb would be beneficial to AH.  Why?  Right now it seems everything is funneled to the industrial complex.  If there were motor pools, railroad yards, supply ports, coal mines, mini-cities, or other such targets to bomb that would add X number of minutes to OBJ down times (call it an interruption of the circle of industries, etc), then perhaps what was once a major part of AH may return: attack missions by Mossi's, A20's, 110's, etc.  Attacking the industrial complex with anything but high altitude bombers is suicide.

I say keep the industrial complex as the key part of the strategic strategy, but having some out laying targets of lessor value but yet still important enough to defend would only add to the depth of AH.  Offering variety would be a huge benefit, imo. 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Strat suggestion
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2012, 03:42:51 PM »
cherry sunburst with a SD hotrail in the bridge position.
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Eric19

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 591
Re: Strat suggestion
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2012, 09:02:10 PM »
add railyards little to no ack on them so the fighter jocks can come in and have some with there bombs rockets and 50s lol we bomber pilots have enough to bomb as is
Proud member of the 91ST BG (H) The Ragged Irregulars