Author Topic: Civilian Death Counts  (Read 684 times)

Offline tuton25

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Re: Civilian Death Counts
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2012, 04:21:26 PM »
How much you want to bet the OP is less than 14????
><))))*> Da Fish is in Da Fight

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Civilian Death Counts
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2012, 04:28:42 PM »
Pretty good bait regardless of the morbidity levels. Someone should give him an "Angler of the Week" award.

Skuzzy could put in a new emoticon for trolling POSTS with a fishing guy hooking a live one.

bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Mickthestick

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 94
Re: Civilian Death Counts
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2012, 05:54:14 PM »
Pretty good bait regardless of the morbidity levels. Someone should give him an "Angler of the Week" award.

Skuzzy could put in a new emoticon for trolling POSTS with a fishing guy hooking a live one.

(Image removed from quote.)

This deserves a new thread.

Offline matt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Civilian Death Counts
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2012, 06:02:08 PM »
One of the pleasures of high-altitude level bombing is knowing, with a very high degree of certainty, that while you're up there, 5 miles above the earth and at least somewhat safe, there are civilian buildings getting obliterated down below.

That being said, I think it's high time that damage points get redefined into terms that have at least some parallels in reality.

One of the main prongs should be civilian death counts. It does not need to be displayed upon landing, but perhaps reported along with the rest of the bomber score.

Morbid, perhaps, but  :rock :rock
:uhoh