Author Topic: Bout that time again, eh chaps?  (Read 1110 times)

Offline ink

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11274
Re: Bout that time again, eh chaps?
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2013, 03:34:10 PM »
I land gear up because it's fun to destroy things. In a video game that counts one wheel off the concrete as a "ditch", I am not too concerned with making a "proper" landing unless I am going to use my plane again.


same here...I never land wheels down....( I have, just don't do it on a typical sortie)...its much faster to just come to a quick stop....hit end flight and reroll....

I always wondered why people cared how others land, but was clued in...they want all to land wheels down so it is easier to vulch em. :rofl



Offline Scotch

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
Re: Bout that time again, eh chaps?
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2013, 04:19:58 PM »
I doubt that is Earl's reasoning.



This plane is garbage. The single seater would have been nice.
-AoM-

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: Bout that time again, eh chaps?
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2013, 04:51:59 PM »
Challenge accepted!
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline tunnelrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: Bout that time again, eh chaps?
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2013, 09:01:58 PM »
I doubt that is Earl's reasoning.



This plane is garbage. The single seater would have been nice.

Next month will be a single seater fo sho...
In-Game: 80hd
The Spartans do not enquire how many the enemy are but where they are.

Offline Scotch

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
Re: Bout that time again, eh chaps?
« Reply #19 on: January 16, 2013, 12:16:34 AM »
No I mean, we should have the single seat 410. It would have better performance and people might actually use it.
-AoM-

Offline tunnelrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: Bout that time again, eh chaps?
« Reply #20 on: January 16, 2013, 10:30:27 AM »
No I mean, we should have the single seat 410. It would have better performance and people might actually use it.

Ohhhhh... it'd certainly be nice as an option.

In-Game: 80hd
The Spartans do not enquire how many the enemy are but where they are.

Offline matt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Bout that time again, eh chaps?
« Reply #21 on: January 16, 2013, 11:10:26 AM »
Hahaha that's why I picked it... a lot of work was put into making it, and it doesn't see as much play as it should for the devastating boom boom up front.

I'd be lucky to land 3 in it.  I figure if someone can beat that by 10, they deserve a reward!


****Snailman****

Offline tunnelrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: Bout that time again, eh chaps?
« Reply #22 on: January 16, 2013, 01:18:29 PM »
In-Game: 80hd
The Spartans do not enquire how many the enemy are but where they are.