I hate getting killed by my own puffy too. I have come around to replanning how I attack bombers in my own puffy ack. When was the last time you complained about field ack shooting you?
Your idea is unrealistic and favors the defensive fighters over the offensive bombers. Bombers are already pretty much nothing more than targets (big ones) and are really easy to kill even in the puffy ack. Since everyone has the same odds of attacking bombers in puffy ack, then I don't think anything needs to change. How many times does this actually affect you in a month? Once? Twice?
-1
Where is that dead horse graphic again?
An interesting contradiction. On th eone hand you say attacking buffs in ack is no big deal, then you say turning off the puffy gives an advantage to the fighters. If attack in the puffy is no big deal for fighters, then the buff face the double threat of fighters AND puffy. In that case, shutting off the puffy helps the buffs.
If the puffy is lethal to fighters, then shouldn't th edefending team get to choose which of there defenses is most effective? They can choose to let the puffy do it, or they can attack with fighters hence turning off the puffy.
But you seem to like, and be in favor of the idea of Friendly puffy defending incoming enemy buffs from friendly fighters. This is your posotion...correct?