Author Topic: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic  (Read 615 times)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« on: April 09, 2013, 08:50:06 PM »
There have been many whines and crying over the years about the supposed unrealistic collision modeling in GVs with ground objects, such as trees stopping a GV dead in its tracks.  To put these cries of unrealism to sleep, here is a video that clearly shows how true to life the ground collision modeling is in GVs.

Video that shows the accurate and realistic modeling of ground collisions


You may put away the tissues ladies.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2013, 09:10:27 PM »
Hrm... a modern steel post of tough Russian construction no doubt anchored to many tons of steel and cement infrastructure.....


vs a tree or shrub?


They do not compare.

For more information see here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKnB5XabdxI

and this modern LIGHT vehicle (Stryker) has WHEELS, not TRACKS, and without even trying was knocking down a reinforced cinderblock wall:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=UWgbuQg0DFk
(note: They were just trying to break the gate open, they weren't trying to wreck the wall)


Tanks had a lot more pushing power than you give them credit for.

Offline 10thmd

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2013, 09:25:49 PM »
Have to agree with Krusty on this one.
Several things to take into consideration with that Video. First that is a BMD a version of the Bmp that has been lightened for airborne drops. It weighs 7.5 tons and has a very small powerplant only producing 241hp. Compare that to a Panther weighing 44.8 tons and having a powerplant producing 690hp. Plus that tin can was barely moving when he hit that pole. I post this in response.

http://www.military.com/video/combat-vehicles/combat-tanks/m1a1-tank-removes-trees-in-australia/1716924710001/
« Last Edit: April 09, 2013, 09:27:48 PM by 10thmd »
- Der Wander Zirkus -
“You can all go to hell; I will go to Texas

Offline skorpx1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1130
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2013, 10:10:57 PM »
There have been many whines and crying over the years about the supposed unrealistic collision modeling in GVs with ground objects, such as trees stopping a GV dead in its tracks.  To put these cries of unrealism to sleep, here is a video that clearly shows how true to life the ground collision modeling is in GVs.

Video that shows the accurate and realistic modeling of ground collisions


You may put away the tissues ladies.

ack-ack

So...A tank doing maybe 6mph at max hits a light pole and it doesn't go down?


No surprise there.


Offline Triton28

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2248
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2013, 07:43:34 AM »
That coading didn't look right..
Fighting spirit one must have. Even if a man lacks some of the other qualifications, he can often make up for it in fighting spirit. -Robin Olds
      -AoM-


Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2013, 05:14:16 PM »
While were at it, I wish TigerIs would be able to plow into the side of a building for a good hiding spot.
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline Mano

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2188
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2013, 08:17:22 PM »
Another issue is collisions are turned off. You can drive right through an enemy tank.
It is an airplane sim and maybe collisions with GV just don't work. A collision in planes .....and a wing or some other part of the plane is damaged resulting in a cripple plane or worse. Would be nice if the two tanks suffered damage.
There might not be a collision model yet. It would certainly require allot of programming
I would expect those palm trees to go right down.  :D

I would like to see trees get knocked down with the tank slowing down while plowing through.  ;)
As far as cement light poles......hmmmmmm.



« Last Edit: April 10, 2013, 08:20:16 PM by Mano »
Everything is funny as long as it is happening to somebody else.
- Will Rogers (1879 - 1935)

Offline redcatcherb412

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 610
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2013, 09:27:59 AM »
Another issue is collisions are turned off. You can drive right through an enemy tank.
It is an airplane sim and maybe collisions with GV just don't work. A collision in planes .....and a wing or some other part of the plane is damaged resulting in a cripple plane or worse. Would be nice if the two tanks suffered damage.
.
So true.  How many times have players wished for the capability to run over and flatten the jeep or pilot on the ground peppering you with their .50 or .45cal.
Ground Pounders ...

Offline A8TOOL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1720
      • http://fdrs.org/banking_history.html
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2013, 11:37:38 AM »


 :rolleyes: Dipshack-ack  :rolleyes:

Offline mensa180

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4010
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2013, 03:22:58 PM »
possibly the best return on effort I've ever seen, good job akak.
inactive
80th FS "Headhunters"
Public Relations Officer

Offline Mar

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2199
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2013, 04:10:28 PM »
possibly the best return on effort I've ever seen, good job akak.

 :aok
𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓈𝒽𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓌𝓈 𝑜𝒻 𝓌𝒶𝓇'𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓃 𝑜𝒻 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒶𝒾𝓇 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒

  "Onward to the land of kings—via the sky of aces!"
  Oh, and zack1234 rules. :old:

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #12 on: April 11, 2013, 04:16:00 PM »
possibly the best return on effort I've ever seen, good job akak.

Caught me the elusive Krusty striped back marlin on my first try.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline RedBull1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #13 on: April 11, 2013, 04:18:43 PM »
Caught me the elusive Krusty striped back marlin on my first try.

ack-ack
:rofl :rofl :rofl
"There is absolutely no point discussing anything on the BBS, it's mostly populated by people who are right about everything, no one listens and everyone is just talking. People will argue over the shape of an egg." -Anonymous

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Proof GV ground collision modeling is accurate and realistic
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2013, 05:05:18 PM »

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!