Author Topic: What it looks like to have a tank shell coming at you....  (Read 1125 times)

Offline Grayeagle

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1488
Re: What it looks like to have a tank shell coming at you....
« Reply #30 on: April 20, 2013, 07:31:26 AM »
Also looks like the tankers have it pretty rough
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGd1Zjtvr8Y

Ok .. I laughed when I saw the cameraman *behind* the bazooka ..filming that.
Wonder if he has any eyebrows left?

And yes .. great example of why tanks suck at city fighting without infantry support.

-Frank aka GE
'The better I shoot ..the less I have to manuever'
-GE

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
Re: What it looks like to have a tank shell coming at you....
« Reply #31 on: April 20, 2013, 07:58:49 AM »
Yup, I am amazed that the SAA will go into those neighborhoods with no troop support... many a t-72's have paid the price...

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Re: What it looks like to have a tank shell coming at you....
« Reply #32 on: April 20, 2013, 08:26:31 AM »
If your worried about virus and spyware, the last place you want them is on your smartphone. That little box now holds a lot of information about who we are & what we do. many use the phone to internet bank, access company documents and store personal data.

Better yet smartphones are an instant cash cow. Android has dozens of in the wild exploits which start placing SMS messages to premium priced SMS services and/or making silent calls to toll numbers hosted by the criminals. Which is why I would never use an Android phone without a prepaid connection. That way you lose 20 bucks at most if your phone gets pwned.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline CptA

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 186
Re: What it looks like to have a tank shell coming at you....
« Reply #33 on: April 20, 2013, 04:49:05 PM »
There's something wrong with the description of this being a tank "shell" being fired.

I think we're seing the firing of a Gun-Launched Anti-Tank missle...probably an AT-8 Songster (Soviet 9K112 Kobra).

I've seen too many main gun rounds being fired from tanks during my 31 years of military service as a U.S. Tank Crewman to believe that this is a standard main gun round being fired.

Here are the reasons I think so:

1. There is very little muzzle flash at the instant of firing...too little to be a high pressure main gun round. However, there is a very large ammount of gray smoke as one would expect to see from the booster motor of an ATGM.

2. The round has a large bore diameter that is too large for a SABOT round, but about right for a HEAT or HEP round.

3. The range is very short but the time of flight is too long...this is a VERY slow round. Too slow for a SABOT, HEAT, or HEP round.

4. The ammount of ballistic drop is extreme for a round fired from so close. This is however typical of the 3-5 degrees of additional elevation above the line of sight required for the missile guidance system to acquire the IR flare burning at the tail of the missile (clearly visible in the slow motion) which is used to correct the flight path, and guide the warhead to the target.

5. The terminal effects are much less than I would have expected from a HEAT or HEP round fired at close range...I don't think the warhead had enough time or distance to properly arm prior to the impact.

CptA
Steel on Target!