Be afraid...Skynet is here!

[guncrasher]

As usual you can't follow along, no wonder your girlfriend beat you up.

So go ahead and fill us in as to how you became an expert on autonomous hunter/killer cyborg technology.

oh boy slash, as usual, resort to personal attacks when you cant contradict an argument.  this reminds me of my last fight with my ex-wife's.  she asked me to lend her 500 bucks when I said no, she just replied "well you are fat".

I just looked at her smiled and replied "yes I am".  how can you argue with that logic? .


semp

[Slash27]

oh boy slash, as usual, resort to personal attacks when you cant contradict an argument.  this reminds me of my last fight with my ex-wife's.  she asked me to lend her 500 bucks when I said no, she just replied "well you are fat".

I just looked at her smiled and replied "yes I am".  how can you argue with that logic? .


semp

Oh, poor semp. Maybe you should think about that next time you make a comment about my wife.

[guncrasher]

Oh, poor semp. Maybe you should think about that next time you make a comment about my wife.

well your wife is in the hospital right now, she's in bad shape.  so I'll make sure when I visit to tell her that you lover her  .


semp

[Slash27]

wtf?

[BaDkaRmA158Th]

 


Knock it off.



Fact of the matter is unlike the objects that followed a preset path, be it a table with a few glass's of wine programed to turn 90 degree after 3 feet, then another 90 after 6 feet, to stop for xxx abount of seconds, has and is possible.

Now when someones add's say, a few billion "gears" to said object "in the form of code" it not had a choice, now add sensors and other devices, and the data being fed into said machine will dictate how* that object functions.

Now put all of that into a machine that is pre-programed to "save itself, no matter the cost, even if it involves killing/terminating/destorying whatever is trying to do it "harm". Then tell it to target and attack other "moving human shaped objects" and you have a killing loop. Something that is programed to kill kill kill kill kill, till some 4 star general enter's in the "stop" command/number.

As far as skynet* go's imagine something that is taught the same, kill kill kill, save yourself. And its the 4 star general and doesnt give a good gosh dang about issueing any "stop" command. "side note"

Figure it.

[Fud]

Knock it off.



Fact of the matter is unlike the objects that followed a preset path, be it a table with a few glass's of wine programed to turn 90 degree after 3 feet, then another 90 after 6 feet, to stop for xxx abount of seconds, has and is possible.

Now when someones add's say, a few billion "gears" to said object "in the form of code" it not had a choice, now add sensors and other devices, and the data being fed into said machine will dictate how* that object functions.

Now put all of that into a machine that is pre-programed to "save itself, no matter the cost, even if it involves killing/terminating/destorying whatever is trying to do it "harm". Then tell it to target and attack other "moving human shaped objects" and you have a killing loop. Something that is programed to kill kill kill kill kill, till some 4 star general enter's in the "stop" command/number.

As far as skynet* go's imagine something that is taught the same, kill kill kill, save yourself. And its the 4 star general and doesnt give a good gosh dang about issueing any "stop" command. "side note"

Figure it.

buzz kill....

[USAFCAPcTSgt]

Nothing will happen until the programmers can develop software to enable this

1.A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
 2.A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
 3.A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.


or

1."Serve the public trust"
 2."Protect the innocent"
 3."Uphold the law"
 4.(Classified)


We should be safe.

[BaDkaRmA158Th]

Nothing will happen until the programmers can develop software to enable this

1.A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
 2.A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
 3.A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.


or

1."Serve the public trust"
 2."Protect the innocent"
 3."Uphold the law"
 4.(Classified)


We should be safe.

WHAT makes you think for a second a human being would ever program his or her creations with such rule's* !?! Who designs a tank, or a gun or a cannon would ever show respect or mercy for life?!

I get you, robocop..a human more human and machine then any terminator could hope to be.

"murphy is that you?" said no one to any terminator or pre-programed machine,ever.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c55P4gan8w   

[Plawranc]

I wrote a paper on Artificial Intelligence.

I came to the conclusion that intelligence with self awareness and control over its own actions is an artificial life form. And if this artificial life form is sentient, then any use of it without proper conditions and or payment is slavery.

So I stress that humanity should NEVER EVER create an artificial life form of human intelligence. Due to the fact we will see it as a machine, where the machine will identify as a life form, and will recognize that it is a slave to its creator.

Forget Terminator. We are talking Battlestar Galactica.

[USAFCAPcTSgt]

The problem is how fast technology is being created.

A famous man once said,"Just because we can do a thing does not mean we must do that thing."


Always, there is another side of the coin to artificial intelligence wrapped inside of a tin can.

Cherry 2000.

I'll let the young'uns do an internet search for Cherry 2000.

[moot]

Humans can think, but can submarines swim?

[Volron]

The problem is how fast technology is being created.

A famous man once said,"Just because we can do a thing does not mean we must do that thing."


Always, there is another side of the coin to artificial intelligence wrapped inside of a tin can.

Cherry 2000.

I'll let the young'uns do an internet search for Cherry 2000.

 

I honestly wonder how many will actually get that WITHOUT having to google it.

 

[USAFCAPcTSgt]

The problem is how fast technology is being created.

A famous man once said,"Just because we can do a thing does not mean we must do that thing."


Always, there is another side of the coin to artificial intelligence wrapped inside of a tin can.

Cherry 2000.

I'll let the young'uns do an internet search for Cherry 2000.

I honestly wonder how many will actually get that WITHOUT having to google it.

 

Anyone born before 1980 and knows the difference between VHS and Betamax.