How is the Ki-67 based on it? The dimensions are completely different, the structures are completely different, the companies involved are completely different, the engineers are completely different.
Your rabidly anti-Japanese biases are showing again.
You have consistently said no to every single Japanese aircraft that people bring up unless it is prewar. You argue that the Japanese were all morons who had no idea how to get anything anywhere after it was built for every Japanese unit after about 1943.
Seeing as your blanket, default statement for anything Japanese is "no" makes it hard to take anything you say seriously. You even opposed the bloody B6N and D4Y. To match your level of opposition to Japanese aircraft in terms of German aircraft you'd have to absolutely deny the Ar234, Bf109K-4, Fw190D-9, Me163, Me262 and Ta152. You have, as I recall, supported the G.55, something that has far less combat or numbers to its credit than almost any Japanese combat aircraft I can think of other than the Ki-102 and B7A2, both of which were built in larger quantities.
To call this the worst suggestion in AH history is beyond belief. You're unhinged when it comes to the subject of Japanese aircraft, and I don't know why.
EDIT:
And yes, as Lusche points out, your own link discredits every one of your claims.
