I think it's a beautiful ship, but what a crock to call it a Destroyer.
Japanese constitution kinda forces their hand there, but it is internal Japanese law, not international treaties, at issue, so China and North Korea don't have any grounds to object.
But if pressed, how quickly do you think they could retrofit some onto that ship?
Rapidly I would imagine. Supposedly it has already been built to support F-35B and Osprey operations.
Good Lord, I wasn't aware it had the same name as a vessel that had shelled Shanghai. Talk about a red rag to a bull. The inability of the Japanese administration to see beyond the end of its own nose is staggering.
Japan seems to do the same thing the UK and USA do, recycle ship names.