Interesting topic........................
.
This is why, when I built my box in May '12 I initially steered away from SSD's as I had read of & heard of all the horror stories concerning them. But as time went on & I read of the continuing improvements in the tech concerning these drives I was caught out in the land of indecision.....as others are/have been as well.
So in Oct '12 I made the decision to find out for myself & after a LOT of reading up on the various SSD's performance specs & reviews I bought 2 OCZ Vertex4 SATA III 256Gb MLC SSD's w/ the Indilinx firmware controllers installed @ $249.95 ea.
I set them both up by using a free copy of EaseUS Todo disk backup software & cloned my platter boot drive on 1 SSD then cloned my platter ghost drive on the 2nd SSD then set them up in the exact same page file configuration as I had my platter drives (took page file off of boot drive & installed/set up on the ghost drive) running natively off the Intel X79 chipset of my Asus Rampage IV Gene ROG mobo under Win7 HP 64 SP1 OS w/ no platter HDD's installed to use as back ups.
I did this to see for myself if all the bad things that I have heard said or read would happen to at least 1 of these SSD's within a reasonable period of time. I got a free copy of AS SSD Benchmark software to initially test both SSD's off fresh cloning for a reference & would test them periodically to see if they were degrading in performance.
As of today (12-7-13....approx 14 months of usage to date) I haven't had or noticed 1 issue w/ these SSD's in operation & according to AS SSD Benchmark neither drive has shown any signs of performance loss due to degradation, especially the ghost drive w/ the page file on it (getting hit w/ the writes) as I have seen less than 1% fluctuation from the initial results at any time so I don't count that as degradation. So for MY box & how it is being used (Internet, AHII\Warbirds 2013 & music--mostly thru Pandora) these SSD's are performing very well. I don't keep any data on the SSD's that is important to me so if they do blow up, big deal.
I have them mounted in hot-swappable 2.5" drive bay enclosures that are mounted in my 3.5" HDD slots in my case just behind my case's front 120mm fan. 1 enclosure is plugged in to the Intel X79's SATA III headders, the 2nd is plugged into the 3rd party HDD controller's SATA III headders (is empty at this time).
1 thing is certain......since I've owned these 2 hot-swappable 2.5" HDD bay enclosures I will NEVER go back to a 3.5" HDD period. The ease of use, no more having to remove the back case panel & wiring to install/remove HDD's is priceless....................
................
As Gman & others have said, don't put too much into expectations concerning SSD's performance from a general consumer's perspective. SSD's do outperform HDD's in most categories from a performance standpoint but the overall EXPERIENCE derived from their usage is dependent on several factors not directly related to them (computer configuration, software type & usage, OS type & usage, etc) & so there's too many varibles to really say that by using SSD's you will notice (read FEEL here) the performance differences between a SSD vs a HDD. Where my box is actually reading/writing data to/from the SSD's vs the HDD's the difference is VERY noticeable.....otherwise no difference.