Author Topic: Best Heavy Fighter  (Read 34223 times)

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #585 on: December 12, 2013, 01:59:40 AM »
But the 109E/190A2 are quite irrelevant to the discussion point T-A,
i.e. fuel availability in the late war period..  ..as is mention of A3 fuel..

So I am 'correcting you'..

"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #586 on: December 12, 2013, 02:05:19 AM »
But the 109E/190A2 are quite irrelevant to the discussion point T-A,
i.e. fuel availability in the late war period..  ..as is mention of A3 fuel..

So I am 'correcting you'..



I never said they were relevant. You said something that was false and something that wasn't entirely true, and I simply corrected you and provided more information.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #587 on: December 12, 2013, 02:09:36 AM »
Data must be in context to retain validity T-A..

Posting of irrelevancies - such as obsolete aircraft types & training aircraft fuel is more like trolling..
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #588 on: December 12, 2013, 04:02:35 AM »
Back on topic.  Best heavy fighter is arguably the P-47D
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #589 on: December 12, 2013, 05:21:14 AM »
But the 109E/190A2 are quite irrelevant to the discussion point T-A,
i.e. fuel availability in the late war period..  ..as is mention of A3 fuel..

What is this A3 fuel?

~ 50% of Luftwaffe fighters in 1945 were BMW801 powered
only a hand full of DB engines used C3 fuel
any Bf109 with red u/c used C3 fuel

How about you provide the real deal jaw, re German avgas stock

Quote
the LW had finally started using their hi-test C3 juice...

If you had not said finally there would have been no comment

Kurfust's original nick was Barbarossa Isegrim which got shortened to Barbi

Offline LilMak

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1344
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #590 on: December 12, 2013, 05:23:24 AM »
Back on topic.  Best heavy fighter is arguably the P-47D
I don't think there is anything to argue about. If you look up heavy fighter in the dictionary, there's a picture of a Jug.
"When caught by the enemy in large force the best policy is to fight like hell until you can decide what to do next."
~Hub Zemke
P-47 pilot 56th Fighter Group.

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #591 on: December 12, 2013, 06:56:04 AM »
Back on topic.  Best heavy fighter is arguably the P-47D
Jup, they are quite good. Their only opponents are the D-hogs.
AoM
City of ice

Offline SirNuke

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1297
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #592 on: December 12, 2013, 11:21:03 AM »
there is a case for the 110G2.

That plane holds so much destructive power that HTC had to increase the town size  :rock

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #593 on: December 12, 2013, 11:24:08 AM »
there is a case for the 110G2.

That plane holds so much destructive power that HTC had to increase the town size  :rock

It is super capable in that role, but I don't think it is was as survivable as the corsair and jug
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #594 on: December 12, 2013, 01:12:29 PM »
I rate my heavy fighters by how many passes you can make on a small field with full ack and fly away.  The P47 three passes.  The P38 two.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #595 on: December 12, 2013, 01:26:27 PM »
190F-8: the ack recognizes it can't but scratch you, and respects your strength by holding fire  :D.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #596 on: December 12, 2013, 03:40:06 PM »
What is this A3 fuel?

~ 50% of Luftwaffe fighters in 1945 were BMW801 powered
only a hand full of DB engines used C3 fuel
any Bf109 with red u/c used C3 fuel

How about you provide the real deal jaw, re German avgas stock

If you had not said finally there would have been no comment

Kurfust's original nick was Barbarossa Isegrim which got shortened to Barbi


M.M.,  So,  Barbi as a nickname, how nice...

Here is a document.. http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/German_Fuel_Consumption.pdf


It lists late war LW fuel particulars, types ( A3, B4, C3 & J2) & usage..

Given the dire war situation, & difficulties resulting - it was remarkable the level of effort the LW
could put up, burning ~30,000 tonnes of juice even in March `45..

The point being that J2 (jet fuel) was in more use, & use of C3 in V12s as a performance measure
( DB 605 @ 1.98 ata) were issues..
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline J.A.W.

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #597 on: December 12, 2013, 04:13:15 PM »
Back on topic.  Best heavy fighter is arguably the P-47D

Well, if by 'best' heavy fighter - you mean porkiest, then the juggernaut is a contender, sure..

The Soviets grabbed a few dozen, but found the idea of using them in AG2 ops as ludicrous..

The RAF didn't think they cut it against their Typhoons for the hi-intensity ETO,
but felt the P-47 was capable of giving the Nippon johnnies a bit of a tickle-up in Burma..
"Cybermen don't make promises..
Such ideas have no value."

Offline LilMak

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1344
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #598 on: December 12, 2013, 04:43:36 PM »
Well, if by 'best' heavy fighter - you mean porkiest, then the juggernaut is a contender, sure..

The Soviets grabbed a few dozen, but found the idea of using them in AG2 ops as ludicrous..

The RAF didn't think they cut it against their Typhoons for the hi-intensity ETO,
but felt the P-47 was capable of giving the Nippon johnnies a bit of a tickle-up in Burma..
Over 3500 air victories, 80,000 rail cars, 9000 locomotives, 6000 armored vehicles, and 68,000 trucks.

Brits and Russians must've been doing it wrong.
"When caught by the enemy in large force the best policy is to fight like hell until you can decide what to do next."
~Hub Zemke
P-47 pilot 56th Fighter Group.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Best Heavy Fighter
« Reply #599 on: December 12, 2013, 05:25:47 PM »


The Soviets grabbed a few dozen, but found the idea of using them in AG2 ops as ludicrous..



Soviets grabbed more than a few dozen, more like 203 P-47D-22-RE and 27-RE's.  The Soviets did an evaluation on the P-47 to see if it was suited to be used from air stations in the polar regions.  In that test, 3 things were being evaluated:

  • Bomber escort
  • Horizontal and dive bombing
  • Attacking ship escorts

The results of the tests were favorable and this led the way for some of the Thunderbolts to be sent to Soviet Naval air defense squadrons.  The issue the Soviets had with the P-47 had nothing to do with its ground attack capabilities, that wasn't the main reason why the P-47 was sent to them.  The Soviets needed fighters, but they didn't need high altitude escort fighters, which the P-47 was.  They needed fighters that could dog fight at low altitudes, which was more in tune with how the aerial combat on the Eastern Front was, as such the P-47 was not suited in that style of combat as opposed to the high altitude combat mostly seen on the Western Front.  This is why most of the Soviet Thunderbolts saw service with the various air defense units and not front line aviation units.

ack-ack
« Last Edit: December 12, 2013, 05:44:34 PM by Ack-Ack »
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song