BigJim, you couldn't be more wrong there. This is not a c hog whine. Not once do I ever say that there is a thing wrong with it. All I do is post facts. If that is a whine, please pass more cheese.

I personally have no problem with the 1c. True, I will not fly it, but I don't have a problem with other people who choose to do so. (They are pretty fun to shoot down in the f6f.

) They pay their $30 just like me.
My true intentions here were just to find some commonalities between the "top 30" pilots. I had figured (incorrectly) that the top 30 pilots would tend to favor fighters that require the use of ACM to win battles. To be sure, some of the top 30 pilots did. A couple flew the p38 for 80% of their kills. Another few flew 190s, p51s, a6m5, 109g10, and even a 190f4 pilot. The majority, however, tended to spend 80% of their time in the f4u, f65, and n1k. This can only lead to 2 conclusions IMO: A. The stats are weighted heavily toward attack. B. The f4u has an advantage that none of the other planes have, and the "top 30" pilots realize it.
Although I have
no problem whatsoever with people flying planes like the f4u1c and n1k; I do feel that the f4u1c does present a gameplay problem. The f4u1c pilots are not to blame. They simply are using the best tool for the job, that's smart flying, and what makes them "top 30" pilots.
If you feel that this constitutes a whine, then so be it.
------------------
bloom25
THUNDERBIRDS