Author Topic: torque question  (Read 1449 times)

Offline Schen

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 314
Re: torque question
« Reply #30 on: January 17, 2014, 10:24:06 AM »
"Fighting in the air is not sport. It is scientific murder"
           Captain Edward V. 'Eddie' Rickenbacker


   ---Committing scientific murder since tour 157---
                       :devil

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: torque question
« Reply #31 on: January 17, 2014, 10:41:12 AM »
We had a 46 pager on the conveyor topic.

There is much more to the question as you start examining it in detail.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,197189.0.html

HiTech

Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14206
Re: torque question
« Reply #32 on: January 17, 2014, 11:07:08 AM »
Pick the tail up too soon on a B-17 (real life) and that will be well demonstrated…..and if you have any left crosswind you might find you don't have enough rudder (you do still have adverse yaw and differential power if needed).


Never thought of that.  Was thinking a C-46 would be hairy.  B-17 never even came to mind.  Wow.

I remember seeing Chuckie and Texas Raiders "bow" to the crowd from a dead stop so no doubt the tail can come up early.   What a wake up call that would be. 
”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted

Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14206
Re: torque question
« Reply #33 on: January 17, 2014, 11:12:48 AM »
actually what I was pointing out was the prior reply where that posting that most planes turn left and rest turn right.  which left out the p38.


semp

For all practical purposes the P-38 because of its handed propeller rotation has two critical engines (not exactly, but close) as opposed to something like a Seminole which almost doesn't.   I suppose that helps with maneuverability or something, but sure makes losing either engine a challenge.     Don't recall if inward prop rotation was considered but seems on the surface to have been a better idea (I have no idea the impact on thrust, maneuverability, vibration, etc. though).  Conventional rotation was a dud.  Random thought.
”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted

Offline colmbo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2246
      • Photos
Re: torque question
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2014, 06:27:43 PM »


I remember seeing Chuckie and Texas Raiders "bow" to the crowd from a dead stop so no doubt the tail can come up early. 

That would be easy to do with power and brakes.  In fact you can "back" a B-17 using brakes and differential power.
Columbo

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."

Fate whispers to the warrior "You cannot withstand the storm" and the warrior whispers back "I AM THE STORM"