Author Topic: More and more bailing after bombing  (Read 7770 times)

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17314
Re: More and more bailing after bombing
« Reply #165 on: September 02, 2014, 09:16:35 PM »
How about making kills in bombers part of the ranking system. Maybe that would be a incentive to not bail.

that make it fair if a fighter is within icon range and he wont engage then it counts as a kill.  same for a fighter that takes damage and dives down to ditch.


semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: More and more bailing after bombing
« Reply #166 on: September 03, 2014, 06:26:54 AM »
 lets put kill switches on fighters who run from bombers while we are at it   :rolleyes:


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23860
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: More and more bailing after bombing
« Reply #167 on: September 03, 2014, 12:02:34 PM »
There are bombers running from fighters as well.
Which I don't really have problem with, even though it may suck on a personal level when I can't reach that high Mossies and B-29s, or Arados diving away.

Using your plane's strengths is quite something different than bailing just to deny someone a kill.

That's why I'm all for matching rpoxy kill range with icon display range. "Oh, it's a hostile 190! I better bail..."
But of course that would not deter the "bailers for war efficiency" in any way.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2014, 12:04:39 PM by Lusche »
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman