Author Topic: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S  (Read 2404 times)

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #30 on: February 19, 2014, 10:43:36 PM »
Not sure why you have posted your kills so proudly, without your deaths no one can respect it with a straight face.


 :rofl Fish On!!!!!!! :devil
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #31 on: February 19, 2014, 11:37:04 PM »
The best addition in a long time, and I think Ack Ack be smoking crack crack. 

Each TU-2 kill I have only took 1 burst of my guns on the P-38J to bring one down.  But then, it could be because I aim for certain areas instead of just spray and hope for the best.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #32 on: February 20, 2014, 03:07:34 AM »
So, i guess that if teamkill was possible, u'd be TKed with a smile ? :(


Silly comparison. Griefing friendlies is a completely different matter. For my $14.95 I get to do what I want with my ride.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #33 on: February 20, 2014, 09:37:46 AM »
It's a friggin UFO.

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Lucifer

  • Probation 9/1/2017
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 350
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #34 on: February 20, 2014, 10:59:05 AM »
Exacltly what a TK could answer : "i pay so i do what i want".
I'm not judging anyone, but my exemple just prove one thing : it's not because its possible to do ingame that it's good for the game.

Bailing from 3 undamaged bombers, instead of fighting like they should isnt a normal way of playing.
For those who do it once per day or less, it wont be a problem. For those who bail 30 times a day it will be !  :rock

Silly comparison. Griefing friendlies is a completely different matter. For my $14.95 I get to do what I want with my ride.

" Army Of Wolves "

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #35 on: February 20, 2014, 11:50:24 AM »
Who are you to judge what is the "normal way of playing"?

HiTech once (in)famously said, and I paraphrase: "The point of this game is to ruin the other guy's day."

I'm not sure bailing from bombers is what he had in mind, but anyway. If this is a problem for you then go after the incoming bombers only... They rarely bail.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #36 on: February 21, 2014, 04:55:05 AM »
Once there was an online game that people took really seriously. That was a good thing, or maybe, given the context, understandable...

blah, blah, blah... insert body of story here.

...and, after being pelted with small chunks of metal, assorted detritus, and one very notable watermelon that appeared to have been soaked in human excrement, Tila vowed never to appear as an opening act for that band ever again.

-The End.

So, could someone please tell me how we got from a review of the Tupolev to arguments over bomber etiquette? Oh yeah, the perks thing. It seems like a separate topic. I call hijack.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #37 on: February 21, 2014, 07:40:14 AM »
When I tested it offline with little fuel on board, no bombs and it made me wonder and right away I started to check the weights. Everything I've read points to the fact that Tu-2 is ~1600lbs underweight. That is a lot for a WWII combat aircraft.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,358715.0.html
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #38 on: February 21, 2014, 10:40:01 AM »
Maker, your source and data look pretty reputable. Perhaps Herr Addink could comment.... I know he aspires to fidelity. I wonder if he had a conflicting data source or conflicting info on the inclusions.
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2014, 12:18:55 PM »
I think that's Pyro's department.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #40 on: February 21, 2014, 01:40:28 PM »
The weight difference suggests HTC may have subtracted crew weight instead of adding it. I'm just speculating, I don't know what data HTC has for empty weight.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #41 on: February 21, 2014, 02:04:16 PM »
Even at reduced weight, I very much prefer the A-20 should I have to deal with fighters....

On the other hand, the Tu-2S is extremely formidable attacking GVs, CV groups or any other ground target. You can fight in it, but an A-20 will eat it up in a 1v1 fight. Very poor roll rate, coupled with horrendous stiffening of controls means that the Tu-2S is at a very big disadvantage above 300 mph. My choice for killing stuff on the ground is the Tu-2, but if there are enemy fighters buzzing around, I take the A-20 instead.
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #42 on: February 21, 2014, 02:23:25 PM »
Run that generous WEP and you are up to 6 to 8 K and then up to bomb speed very quickly. And you are there with an extremely effective bomb load. My fave is the 3 baddabooms but the 2 and 4 is a better all arounder. Those 3 2000 KG'ers can smash the heart of a town in one pass like nobodys business.

I speed bomb in  it. It might just be me but I could swear 3 can turn back into a base faster, and then settle for calibration faster, "faster" then speed bombing any other bomber set. A shallow dive gets you back to base quickly.

You get up quick, you get there quick, you hit hard quick, and you get back quick. Which means you can keep up pressure on your chosen target quick.

I Love this thing. :aok  :airplane:
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #43 on: February 21, 2014, 03:11:30 PM »
God help us all when TWC do their raids in A20s instead of loaded  38s  :pray
My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline Blinder

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 547
Re: Opinions on the performance of the TU2S
« Reply #44 on: February 22, 2014, 01:48:26 PM »
I like it's overall performance and loadout much better than the Boston but I still prefer the glass-nosed Mossie to it for general air raiding.
Fighter pilots win glory .... Bomber pilots win wars.



17th Guards Air Assault Regiment (VVS) "Badenov's Red Raiders"