Author Topic: FSO battle of attrition  (Read 1342 times)

Offline captain1ma

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14384
      • JG54 website
Re: FSO battle of attrition
« Reply #15 on: March 17, 2014, 09:22:59 PM »
I was thinking more along the lines of this....  a target base.... it's also a take off base. if the defenders cant defend it, it gets bombed into oblivion. next frame that base is unavailable. I know no one would want to actually capture a base or fly goons I don't really blame them.

IE a carrier setup. if carrier at 3.15 dies, its not usable as a target anymore. now you have to use one of the other carriers as a target, etc etc. this way you'd still have bombers and fighters in play, but parts of the landscape are not available. this would simulate a victory as a battle, and maybe a over all victory of the month if enough of them are sunk

vbase same thing, bomber come in, take most of it out, its not usable anymore, not that we do(use a vbase for much) in the FSO, but you get the idea.

as for planes, the planeset would remain untouched or adjusted as the cm's deemed necessary. just a subtle little change in the gameplay.... nothing drastic
« Last Edit: March 17, 2014, 09:59:45 PM by captain1ma »

Offline FBDragon

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 716
Re: FSO battle of attrition
« Reply #16 on: March 17, 2014, 09:34:10 PM »
I feel the same way. Play your role, fly what your told. With out the bombers its not FSO...it's king of the hill.



I'll be the first one to agree with you. I really don't like any of the ricepaper planes at all (no offence) but thats what we were given so I fly them. You gotta take the bad with the good. I love the FSO ( I think it's the only reason I still play) and wouldn't even dream of not showing up cause I didn't get what I wanted to fly. So to all the ones that wine about it, SUCK IT UOP!!! Or don't even play.   :salute
Kommando Nowotny
XO
To Win The Winter Sky
Gl 1/Jg 11

Offline Trainee

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 281
Re: FSO battle of attrition
« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2014, 05:10:08 PM »
We'll be there in Wright Flyers with bricks if required.
 :airplane: :cheers:
Trainee
~~~THE UNFORGIVEN~~~
"Step aside Butch..."

Offline Ten60

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 275
Re: FSO battle of attrition
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2014, 07:11:01 PM »
I think it'd be BA if you allowed a total restricted number of planes for each month.  For instance:

12 F4U-C's for the entire 3 frames.  If 11 are lost frame 1, then you only have 1 left.
80 B24's.  If 8 are lost then you have 72 for frame 2 and if in frame 2 55 are lost, then you have 17 left for frame 3.

So on and so on.  Depending on the victory conditions of the frame you could even award a % returned if a target base was completely destroyed.

For that matter you could award returns based on type of kill.  if 10 pilots bailed bravely, 30% of that airframe are returned for next frame.

Just a thought.  FSO studs like their realism.  That's for real.
"Maybe there are 5,000, maybe 10,000 Nazi bastards in their concrete foxholes before the Third Army. Now if Ike stops holding Monty's hand and gives me some supplies, I'll go through the Siegfried Line like %&# through a goose"

Offline tmetal

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2279
Re: FSO battle of attrition
« Reply #19 on: March 18, 2014, 07:14:00 PM »
Restricted total plane numbers happen fairly often with 262's, arrado's and sometimes with the 163's
The real problem is anyone should feel like they can come to this forum and make a wish without being treated in a derogatory manner.  The only discussion should be centered around whether it would work, or how it would work and so on always in a respectful manner.

-Skuzzy 5/18/17

Offline Viper61

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 585
Re: FSO battle of attrition
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2014, 04:57:24 PM »
good ideas and comments I think.  And I think most would agree what we have now is a Snap Shot type of event played out 3 times in a row.  The frames need to tie together in some form where there is cause and effect to what you do or don't do.

Offline Ten60

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 275
Re: FSO battle of attrition
« Reply #21 on: March 19, 2014, 05:42:31 PM »
Restricted total plane numbers happen fairly often with 262's, arrado's and sometimes with the 163's
I recall this.  But frankly if Allies lose 80 out of 80 B24's in a set, they wouldn't have gotten 80 fresh ones the next week...
"Maybe there are 5,000, maybe 10,000 Nazi bastards in their concrete foxholes before the Third Army. Now if Ike stops holding Monty's hand and gives me some supplies, I'll go through the Siegfried Line like %&# through a goose"

Offline Nefarious

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15858
Re: FSO battle of attrition
« Reply #22 on: March 20, 2014, 08:02:48 PM »
Lots of interesting ideas, most have been tried before in FSO but are definitely worth revisiting while still using standard objectives and victory conditions (points). I have used different twists in trying to make FSO trying to spice it up a little. I have used the evacuation goal where ships represent men evacuated or the Re-supply FSO in Stalingrad.

I will consider trying to incorporate some of these ideas into my remaining setups in 2014.  :aok
There must also be a flyable computer available for Nefarious to do FSO. So he doesn't keep talking about it for eight and a half hours on Friday night!