Author Topic: Messerschmitt Bf.109  (Read 3248 times)

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7294
Re: Messerschmitt Bf.109
« Reply #30 on: May 21, 2014, 05:11:18 PM »
James Bradley's Fly Boys cited that you would have to be nuts to be a WWII pilot - the planes were very unreliable usually due to how fast they were introduced into Service without real environmental testing.  A lot of pilots were lost from non-combat accidents... I thought he mentioned it was almost 1 to 1.

"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Messerschmitt Bf.109
« Reply #31 on: May 21, 2014, 05:32:25 PM »
It was the same before WWII and also after the war. Even today flying combat aircraft is a dangerous occupation, especially if it is a new design. F-16s were dropping out of the skies in the 1980s to all kinds of technical problems, and of the 187 F-22s produced two have already crashed due to malfunctions. 129 helicopters and 24 fixed-wing aircraft have been reported lost in Iraq since the 2003 invasion. Only 46 of these have been attributed to hostile action.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Denniss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: Messerschmitt Bf.109
« Reply #32 on: May 22, 2014, 04:06:20 PM »
There's a difference. There was no two-seat version of the 109 until the G-12 entered service in December 1944, so the vast majority of Luftwaffe pilots flew their first flight in the 109 solo after only 10-15 hours of flight training in advanced trainers like the Bf 108.
The G-12 was delivered at least from 12/43 so your date is slightly off. And yes, if a pilot doesn't handle the throttle properly while on the ground it could easily swing to one side. It may have become a bit easier with G-10/-14/-K4 having less take-off power available than G-6 (unless you want to waste your MW-50 supply for take-off).

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Messerschmitt Bf.109
« Reply #33 on: May 22, 2014, 04:20:38 PM »
I must have gotten the year wrong then. Still only about 100 G-12s were converted from old Gustavs, and they didn't see much actual use. "On the job training" was all the Luftwaffe had time for in 1944-45.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Denniss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: Messerschmitt Bf.109
« Reply #34 on: May 23, 2014, 05:17:19 PM »
Make this 403 and you are correct. All made by Blohm & Voss between 12/43 and 1/45

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: Messerschmitt Bf.109
« Reply #35 on: May 23, 2014, 06:11:59 PM »
Is that the number of G-12s actually accepted by the Luftwaffe? I've always thought is was around one hundred.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."