Author Topic: The torpedo bombers that might have been  (Read 3504 times)

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: The torpedo bombers that might have been
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2014, 02:02:51 PM »
Lest we forget the real monster of em all.....

Douglas TB2D Skypirate

General characteristics
Crew: three
Length: 46 ft 0 in (14.02 m)
Wingspan: 70 ft 0 in (21.34 m)
Height: 22 ft 7 in (6.88)
Wing area: 605 ft² (56.2 m²)
Empty weight: 18,405 lb (8,348 kg)
Loaded weight: 28,545 lb (12,948 kg)
Max. takeoff weight: 34,760 lb (15,767 kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Pratt & Whitney R-4360-8 Wasp Major radial engine, 3,000 hp (2,238 kW)

Performance
Maximum speed: 340 mph (296 kn, 546 km/h)
Cruise speed: 168 mph (146 kn, 270 km/h)
Range: 1,250 mi (1,087 nmi, 2,013 km)
Service ceiling: 24,500 ft (7,450 m)
Rate of climb: 1,390 ft/min (7.2 m/s)

Armament

Guns:
4 × wing mounted .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns
2 × .50 in (12.7 mm) machine guns in dorsal turret
1 × .50 in machine gun in ventral bath

Bombs: Up to 8,400 lb (3,810 kg) of bombs or four torpedoes









bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15719
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: The torpedo bombers that might have been
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2014, 02:57:38 PM »
Lest we forget the real monster of em all.....

Wow!  It is a monster!

Looks like it had ailerons that could deploy as flaps as well.
First flight 1945.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: The torpedo bombers that might have been
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2014, 05:14:39 PM »
That monster is so big it probably would have been better off with two engines.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15719
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: The torpedo bombers that might have been
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2014, 05:42:50 PM »
That monster is so big it probably would have been better off with two engines.

In a way, it does have two engines -- two Pratt & Whitney Double Wasps (double row) spliced together to make the P & W Wasp Major (quadruple row).

It has about the same wingspan as a B-26.

As a torpedo-bomber pilot in scenarios, I salivate over this TB2D.  :aok

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: The torpedo bombers that might have been
« Reply #19 on: June 11, 2014, 06:08:27 PM »
B7A2 'Grace', A6M5 level performance and actually fought, though in limited numbers.  Also only a single torpedo.



Japan had no carriers left by the time it entered service so even though equipped for CV ops it never flew from one.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: The torpedo bombers that might have been
« Reply #20 on: June 11, 2014, 07:01:54 PM »
and of course De Havilland also made a navalized torpedo bomber Mosquito (TR.33) just because he could. There was still one combat role that the mosquito did not do... so it did.






post war, about 50 built.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs