Author Topic: In case of a water landing...  (Read 1045 times)

Offline PJ_Godzilla

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2661
Re: In case of a water landing...
« Reply #15 on: July 07, 2014, 12:03:44 PM »
Could be extra long railcars.

Which is okay as long as there are no curves en route what a sufficiently tight radius and sufficiently close railside obstacles that an interference condition would obtain... But I'm with Semp. Something is wrong here, possibly that there are 3 fuselages in a f***ing stream...
Some say revenge is a dish best served cold. I say it's usually best served hot, chunky, and foaming. Eventually, you will all die in my vengeance vomit firestorm.

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6865
Re: In case of a water landing...
« Reply #16 on: July 07, 2014, 12:10:21 PM »
Boeing paid for upgrades to the lines so they could ship the fuselages.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: In case of a water landing...
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2014, 01:03:57 PM »
Which is okay as long as there are no curves en route what a sufficiently tight radius and sufficiently close railside obstacles that an interference condition would obtain... But I'm with Semp. Something is wrong here, possibly that there are 3 fuselages in a f***ing stream...

I say make them into water slides.  they're already there why waste money taking them out.  make it a tourist atraction :).



semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12899
Re: In case of a water landing...
« Reply #18 on: July 07, 2014, 04:56:15 PM »
Looks like it already is a tourist attraction
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women