Not Relevant to a 2v2.
It is. You're trying to muddle pilot skill (individual) with wingman skill because you are better at the latter (probably).
Did you read what I said about inference?
If you or Skyyr want to have a discussion about inference, argument, logic and the significance and use of each then let's have a separate discussion about it. I'm not going to muddle these topics together for effect.
Such as the same zealousness with which turn/stall fighters defend their own style? I'm not sure what you mean what we are seeing here?
No I don't think so. Turn / stall fighters accept BnZ as part of their daily activities and develop techniques to counter that approach. They have to. They are still killed by that approach to an inevitable percentage which varies upon their skill and concentration on that moment. Your approach is inherently more risk free, safer and easier to apply. When you assert you're superior because you killed them (once seems to do) then you are conveniently ignoring this factor and concentrating on your own awesomeness. Skyyr made one film (still with arguably griefing motivation) where he defeated an opponent through the skillful application of ACM from a disadvantage. I myself admire that one piece of flying over a thousand kills starting from an: secure the advantage approach. Your Dicta Boelke philosophy doesn't equate to a skillful reversal of fortune in the Aces High culture because when all said and done skill
seems to be more admired here than score. Honestly I don't see the two of you being able to change this even with the advantage of the background cultural shift towards lower-risk higher-results.
That is the entire point of trying to have a reasonable discussion in regards to 2v2, who judges what is fair though?
It isn't difficult to establish this. You seem to apply a sports mentality. Every sport I can think of emphasizes removing unfair advantage and letting skill settle the result. As AKAK said there has been no argument from you why equal fuel loadout wouldn't work in a 2 vs 2.
As a relatively new guy,
You keep saying this. I've already asked this before and note you declined to answer. How many years did you play your previous air combat flight sim for?
I have seen behavior that is anything but honorable, I have seen hypocrisy that is just laughable. I will brag to those people if I beat them in this type of competition. I expect the same to be done to me.
Not everybody behaves this way. It is your choice to respond in kind which contributes to it, not reduces it.
If any measure of intolerance is to be mentioned..talk about the guys who ignorantly think Energy fighting is easy or cheap.
No that is incorrectly stated. You always have whiners who moan about not getting the fight that suits them hence the Runstang, turntard, 'whatever' terms and so forth. Obviously people are self-centred and want usually instant gratification in the realms of a computer game. Not too difficult to comprehend those complaints for what they are. We are discussing something more ideological.
I told you in response to a conversation with Skyyr I took the time to learn BnZ so at least I was informed about it. I don't think energy fighting or BnZ is cheap I think what is cheap is to use a more risk-reduced approach to assert you are better or more dominant / competitive <insert whatever term that best describes it> then those who do turn / stall fight or choose to fight from a disadvantage.
This is not war, this is a recreational game. Survival is optional and people have different ways of getting their fun. Your own insistence that score /kills / results is the only thing that counts is dogmatic, intolerant and bombastic. When all said and done, trying to built an empire in this tiny teacup is a rather humourous and childish endeavour. Hopefully it is that, otherwise it is a rather desperate statement of neediness.
