Author Topic: Flying porcupine  (Read 728 times)

Offline F77

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 330
Flying porcupine
« on: November 17, 2014, 02:01:07 PM »
Heavier than the cat, better armed, better loadout, flies higher, faster, better power to weight (suprisingly) and more engines!

Short Sunderland anyone?

Offline ONTOS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1140
Re: Flying porcupine
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2014, 04:20:53 PM »
More details please.

Offline palef

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2212
Re: Flying porcupine
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2014, 04:26:14 PM »
Retired

Offline Drane

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 795
Re: Flying porcupine
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2014, 04:40:49 PM »
 :aok +1
92 Squadron RAF - Aut pugna aut morere - 'Either fight or die'

Offline ONTOS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1140
Re: Flying porcupine
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2014, 10:43:45 AM »
Yes , please. +1

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Flying porcupine
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2014, 01:55:02 PM »
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline ONTOS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1140
Re: Flying porcupine
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2014, 03:52:15 PM »
Now that you put it that way, the Emily does have more armament and carries more stuff, it seems a good bird. +2

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: Flying porcupine
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2014, 03:55:09 PM »
I say, add both the Emily and Sunderland. :D
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Flying porcupine
« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2014, 05:42:45 PM »
I say, add both the Emily and Sunderland. :D

If adding pairs, I might recommend doing so as 'natural enemy' opponents. However, shouldn't the role such an addition would have in the game be considered? Even in the PBY thread, I would think (AI) shipping targets would have to be increased. The Sunderland appears to have more of an anti-sub role. There are no subs in AH (nor do I think such could be effectively modeled enough to draw the dedicated sub simmer).

*ShruG*

I'd have to give this a 'model it when a dozen or so more practical and fun things are done first' response - models and game factors.

It is a pretty duck, though.  ;)