Author Topic: Skins  (Read 808 times)

Offline noman

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
      • http://yahoo.com
Skins
« on: January 08, 2015, 02:44:25 PM »
Just a question that popped into my head while looking at all the great pics of the work you guys do on skins. Who decided how a plane was going to be painted? Did every plane in a squad get the same paint job with only minor variations due to them being painted by men and not robots such as cars today?
I know some were painted a certain color and pattern for certain reasons but why the wide variety in Luftwaffe planes? Which by the way I think have some of the best skins.
And a few more all black planes would be awesome. ( hint hint )
Keep up the good work Gentlemen.  :salute
Quote by Delirium:
Frankly, I'd rather be a fluffer at a gay porcupine film company than be a CM.
God bless the CMs for putting up with this community.
Sic Pups        MA
412th FNVG   FSO

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9183
Re: Skins
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2015, 03:48:20 PM »
To quickly answer your question, yes.  :devil

Seriously though,
Each individual aircraft type has its own peculiarities in how paint schemes were applied. To start, there's the regulation from the given air force - in the case of the Luftwaffe its the aircraft ministry known by RLM.  There, regulations in pattern and colors are made based on the role of the aircraft or likely area of operation . Then you have the painting process at the factory (free hand cammo, or stenciled). Of course there are different variations based on aircraft built in different factories. Here's a great example of that pertaining to 109G's http://theprofilepaintshop.blogspot.com/2013/10/chosing-correct-wingpattern-for-bf109g-6.html. Next, there is variation in the color of paints because of either different manufacturers or changes in available pigments.  Finally you have changes made at the depot/ squadron level. Also, don't forget about short term markings or winter cammo.
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Skins
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2015, 04:06:18 PM »
This website:

http://www.jpsmodell.de/dc/main_e.htm

Has a TON of great information on paint specifications not only by nationality, but by service, and even in some cases down to individual aircraft types.

Been trying to get this stickied, as I think it would be a TREMENDOUS help.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9183
Re: Skins
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2015, 05:23:27 PM »
Sax. I find that site to be good for general info on colors and patterns at best. I would verify what you get from there with other sources.
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline Greebo

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7075
Re: Skins
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2015, 04:18:32 AM »
In general some department of the air force that ordered the plane would tell the factory how and with what colours they wanted it painted. However there are lots of exceptions to this.

British, Italian, German and US aircraft were fairly well documented WRT colours and schemes. You can often work out the whole scheme by just looking at a single photo of the plane and referring to drawings of the scheme. However there is the issue of repaints done at a depot or squadron level when a plane was moved to a new theater. For instance a lot of USAAF bare metal planes were given a top coat of olive drab or RAF green when they redeployed to France in 1944. Also some lend lease aircraft ordered by Britain would turn up in the UK painted in the RAF scheme but using the nearest USAAF equivalent colours.

Soviet and Japanese aircraft are a bit more of a minefield, part of the problem being a lack of documentation, although that has improved recently. Photos are often of very poor quality making it difficult to make out the scheme. Also Soviet aircraft schemes tended to a lot less strictly applied, with different factories using there own variations of the official scheme. There is still a lot of debate about what the correct shades are for the various colours used on Soviet aircraft.

Japanese aircraft used fairly standardised factory schemes but in the early to mid war years there was a lot of depot and squadron level repainting going on using all sorts of colours. Also different factories would use different shades of paint to each other. So for instance a Zero made by Mitsubishi would be a different shade of green and grey to one made by Nakajima. Luckily there are various clues that can be got from a B&W photo to tell which factory made the aircraft .
« Last Edit: January 09, 2015, 04:23:03 AM by Greebo »

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Skins
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2015, 10:47:23 AM »
Sax. I find that site to be good for general info on colors and patterns at best. I would verify what you get from there with other sources.

I haven't looked at many of the other sections, but I know for certain it lists the official Navy specs (including the actual spec reference numbers for many of them). There's whole sections on the geometric tail insignia and carrier air group ID markings from later in the war (IE Bunker Hill's white arrow, the lightning bolt flashes on Shangri-La, etc).
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline noman

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
      • http://yahoo.com
Re: Skins
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2015, 11:54:23 AM »
Seems it would take 10 lifetimes to figure all this out which what makes what you guys do all the more impressive. A  big :salute to you guys and what you bring to AH. It would not be the same without what you guys do.
Quote by Delirium:
Frankly, I'd rather be a fluffer at a gay porcupine film company than be a CM.
God bless the CMs for putting up with this community.
Sic Pups        MA
412th FNVG   FSO