Author Topic: "Engineering Analysis of the T34/85 Tank"  (Read 3239 times)

Offline dirtdart

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1847
Re: "Engineering Analysis of the T34/85 Tank"
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2015, 10:57:13 AM »
Download the audio tapes for "in their own words." One of the vets interviewed was a loggy who cleaned and repaired tanks to send back into action. Sobering.
If you are not GFC...you are wee!
Put on your boots boots boots...and parachutes..chutes...chutes.. .
Illigitimus non carborundum

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: "Engineering Analysis of the T34/85 Tank"
« Reply #16 on: February 13, 2015, 04:40:16 PM »
T-34 was an awesome tank in 1941 when they were first put into action near Moscow. The Germans had almost nothing that could defeat its armor at the time, and the 76.2 mm gun was more powerful than those on all German tanks in service. The M4 would have been equally impressive in 1941. We must not forget when analyzing their performance later in the war that the T-34 and M4 are the contemporaries of Spit V and P-40E. They were updated and up gunned later in the war, but they were no match for the newer tanks coming off the production lines in Germany in 1943-45. For that we must look to the Pershing, the Centurion and a whole lot of what-could-have-beens that never made it into production.
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: "Engineering Analysis of the T34/85 Tank"
« Reply #17 on: February 13, 2015, 07:24:15 PM »
Download the audio tapes for "in their own words." One of the vets interviewed was a loggy who cleaned and repaired tanks to send back into action. Sobering.

Early after D-Day most of the first generation M4's were having real troubles with survivor rates. Soon though, all of the M4s with wet-storage ammo bins and the larger 76mm gun began to be used in more realistic tactics. In tank school these men had been told they had the best tank, which was true but it is not designed for tank-vs-tank combat. There were many 76-mm M4s that crews survived as many as five tanks being knocked out. And of course, with proper tactics they did manage to knock out even Panther tanks. Even then it was not within their design to fight tank-vs-tank.

Aces High is nothing like WWII when it comes to the tactics, of course. While we have the tanks, we do not have towed artillery, Division level combat, or infantry. Finally, the restrictions of terrain that kept the Panther on low and level ground does not exist in Aces High. Even the M4 can traverse much steeper ground in AH than it could in actual fact. That's a game concession that we must live with since the terrain itself is not intended to be realistic.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: "Engineering Analysis of the T34/85 Tank"
« Reply #18 on: February 15, 2015, 12:42:59 AM »
Quote
Would not the temperature of the metal also have a effect on how strong or weak it was?

Cold Temps and long storage times for steel actually was a factor for steel quality in Soviet production. So much steel was left laying about due to sloppy accountability and the stress on the Industry base and the moving of it that there was a lot of brittleness in armor plate to varying degrees. Most of all early on when their production capability was so stressed. They got better at everything as the war progressed but their tank steel quality was never on the German level anytime in the war.

Credit the soundness of the T34 design and the courage of its crews for its successes.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline DaveBB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: "Engineering Analysis of the T34/85 Tank"
« Reply #19 on: February 15, 2015, 01:09:50 PM »
The ambient air temperatures of a Russian winter are enough to be able to shatter a carbon steel plate if simply dropped on the ground.
Currently ignoring Vraciu as he is a whoopeeed retard.

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Re: "Engineering Analysis of the T34/85 Tank"
« Reply #20 on: February 15, 2015, 01:16:55 PM »
Download the audio tapes for "in their own words." One of the vets interviewed was a loggy who cleaned and repaired tanks to send back into action. Sobering.


I would like to listen to it but can you direct me specifically to where I can find this?



the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline dirtdart

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1847
Re: "Engineering Analysis of the T34/85 Tank"
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2015, 08:25:47 PM »
Dunno. I had them on cd years back. Let me look around. 
If you are not GFC...you are wee!
Put on your boots boots boots...and parachutes..chutes...chutes.. .
Illigitimus non carborundum