I like new ideas when they are not change for the sake of change.
Change for change's sake is a hallmark of youth, instant gratification, immaturity, and narcissism. When those fail, which is much of the time, the Li'll booger who wanted it, always seems to escape from having to face the music and clean up the failed change. Then some old fert gets stuck with some kid's unnecessary mess.
If you get forced to study 6-sigma, Hosin Process, or one of those schools of time and efficiency popular with large corporations. One of the names for those Li'll boogers is "fire starters". After BofA went 6-sigma, they implemented a team to identify "fire starters" then quietly "helped" them to look elsewhere for employment. Turned out being a "fire starter" was not specifically age dependent. Just more prevalent with younger people. Another kind of "fire starter" is a manager looking to make a name or move in the company not part of his job description. To make the change they essential cause havoc with the department under their care impacting revenue.
Guess then you weigh the cost benefits of more training and disciplinary actions, versus your quarterly numbers on wall street after laying off employees identified as "fire starters". BofA always looked good laying off employees to wall street.