Author Topic: OK confess: who are these tards (Read 627 times)

Animal · « **on:** October 25, 2001, 11:39:00 AM »

The C.202 has 6 kills and has been killed 10 times against the Me 262.

funkedup · « **Reply #1 on:** October 25, 2001, 12:07:00 PM »

We need some kind of Embarassing-Kill-of-Jetdweeb registry. Maybe a forum just for stories about killing jets?

Nifty · « **Reply #2 on:** October 25, 2001, 12:10:00 PM »

Wonder how many are prox kills from people lawndarting.

Maverick · « **Reply #3 on:** October 25, 2001, 06:28:00 PM »

What is the C47 vs 262 ratio????????

Ya can't get any more embarassing than dying to a goonie in a jet!

Mav

jpeg · « **Reply #4 on:** October 25, 2001, 07:39:00 PM »

As of now:

The C-47A has 5 kills and has been killed 70 times against the Me 262.

Edit:
I could have sworn I use to be able to get stats on chute

[ 10-25-2001: Message edited by: jpeg ]

lazs1 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 26, 2001, 08:28:00 AM »

Flying a perk ride should be humiliating enough but some guys are just too dumb to get it. perhaps making perk planes icons pink and anouncing on channel one who got killed in what perk plane would help.
lazs

Staga · « **Reply #6 on:** October 26, 2001, 08:47:00 AM »

Someone pee'd to your coffee Lazs ?

Ripsnort · « **Reply #7 on:** October 26, 2001, 08:48:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga:
Someone pee'd to your coffee Lazs ?

no, someone put coffee in his cup of pee.

AKSWulfe · « **Reply #8 on:** October 26, 2001, 10:15:00 AM »

Well, atleast Lazs is consistant with his beliefs.
-SW

Fariz · « **Reply #9 on:** October 26, 2001, 11:31:00 AM »

262 were unperked for the whole day -- nothing strange so many kills. Check it in the end of next tour, doubt if it will be any 202 kills vs 262.

lazs1 · « **Reply #10 on:** October 26, 2001, 02:09:00 PM »

"Well, atleast Lazs is consistant with his beliefs.
-SW "

Contrast that with rip who is "touchy feely" one minute and bad bellybutton the next. From tough guy to bawling in public.
lazs

Pongo · « **Reply #11 on:** October 26, 2001, 02:26:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SWulfe:
Well, atleast Lazs is consistant with his beliefs.
-SW

a reflex is not based on a belief.
What we have here is a nurousis

lazs1 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 26, 2001, 02:28:00 PM »

who is "we" pngo?
lazs

Pongo · « **Reply #13 on:** October 26, 2001, 03:10:00 PM »

that would be the royal "We"

lazs1 · « **Reply #14 on:** October 27, 2001, 09:44:00 AM »

Ah... sorta like when i tell the guys at work about the dirty job that "we" are gonna have to do.

Well... maybe not... when i say "we" I mean "they"... When you say "we" you mean "I".
lazs

[ 10-27-2001: Message edited by: lazs1 ]