I wonder how many ISIS operatives are moving with these refugees. Grizz brought this up in conversation and I shrugged it off but the more I think about it, the more brialliant it is.
I think that you are asking for a level of assurance that just isn’t obtainable in the real world. Can anyone guarantee that not one single person in migration/refugee flow is a member of ISIS? No. Life doesn’t work that way.
And besides which, don’t you think that if an ISIS guy wanted to sneak into America wouldn’t he/she just go a get a tourist visa or something? I mean,
if you are a bad guy who wanted to do bad things, would you place the operational success of your mission into the hands of an immigration official adjudicating your case in the heartland?
We accept all sorts of risks in our daily lives.
From commuting to eating a Big Mac with a hot cup of coffee, most people can rationally assess their risk exposures and carry on with a fairly normal life. I wish that we could do the same under circumstances that are infrequent and unusual. (Although I must admit that some estimates have this “migration crisis” going on for the next 10 years! Also worldwide UNFPA puts the number of people migrating at 232 million for 2013
http://www.unfpa.org/migration. Maybe one way in which we all might start acting rationally is if/when we see this issue as being “normal”).
The authorities need to be expeditious and smart in processing the migrates/refugees. Again, Europe seems to be a bit of a mixed bag on this.
Stories coming out of Hungary really don’t inspire much confidence towards the notion that an orderly and competent process has been developed and is being followed.
The NYT just did a well thought out thorough piece on this issue:
“When joining the European Union — as the former Communist countries have done since 2004 — nations are asked to pledge support to a raft of so-called European values, including open markets, transparent government, respect for an independent media, open borders, cultural diversity, protection of minorities and a rejection of xenophobia.
But the reality is that the former Communist states have proven sluggish in actually absorbing many of these values and practicing them.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/world/europe/eastern-europe-migrant-refugee-crisis.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0So is an ISIS guy going to get into somewhere? There very well could be “mess ups” and I guarantee you that some loud mouth on cable TV is going to go polemic on the subject and, claim as if in affirmation of his position, that most people agree with him because of his soaring Nelson ratings.
We need to be sensible.
If someone wants to bring over half of Boko Haram for counseling in NJ, yep, it would be about time say “Hold on – we need to think about this”. But that is not what is happening.
I think a fear of an unknown and misunderstood culture, and a worrying sense that the economic climate is not yet robust enough to absorb the needs of these fleeing people, is driving some to an insensitive protective corner. I do not think that it is a tenable position.
Most human beings react sympathetically to people in plight, especially when it is obvious that they had nothing to do with the modern-day, man-made, plague that is raining down upon them.
BTW: Although the US and some of Europe have come under some criticism for not doing enough,
the wealthiest Arab states are doing zip.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/09/04/the-arab-worlds-wealthiest-nations-are-doing-next-to-nothing-for-syrias-refugees/