Author Topic: Explosive rifle caliber ammo  (Read 1071 times)

Offline FLOOB

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3058
Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« on: October 27, 2015, 02:19:22 AM »
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans” - John Steinbeck

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15728
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2015, 11:05:08 AM »
Can I get it in 22 LR?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2015, 11:33:34 AM »
The British .303 De Wilde was explosive.  Used by Hurries and Spits during the Battle of Britain.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline DaveBB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2015, 12:53:47 PM »
A post-war study of U.S. 50 cal ammo found that only API (armor piercing incendiary) was effective at bringing down enemy aircraft.  This is because it tended to ignite the potential energy stores on enemy aircraft (ammunition, fuel, bombs, drop tanks, etc).  The balance of the other ammo had to hit a critical object (pilot, weight supporting member) to be effective.

This study is cited in "Dirty Little Secrets of World War II".
Currently ignoring Vraciu as he is a whoopeeed retard.

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8097
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2015, 01:35:58 PM »
A post-war study of U.S. 50 cal ammo found that only API (armor piercing incendiary) was effective at bringing down enemy aircraft.  This is because it tended to ignite the potential energy stores on enemy aircraft (ammunition, fuel, bombs, drop tanks, etc).  The balance of the other ammo had to hit a critical object (pilot, weight supporting member) to be effective.

This study is cited in "Dirty Little Secrets of World War II".

That's the kind of comment I always find fascinating.  "only API was effective" then 2 sentences later about the alternative, "had to hit a critical object to be effective".  So were they effective or not?

So... and I realize this would be nearly impossible to answer, but it makes me wonder what brought down the planes more often, secondary ignitions or critical object hits?  Come to think of it, the potential energy stores are kind of "critical objects" on their own.

Just seems to me like a comment that doesn't really say much.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline DaveBB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #5 on: October 27, 2015, 01:49:26 PM »
So lets break this down so that even you can understand.  In order to bring an enemy plane down, you had to:

(1)Cause detonation of its ammo. [Only API ammo]
(2)Ignite its fuel tanks. [Only API ammo]
(3)Kill the pilot [API or ball ammo]
(4)Destroy a critical structural member. [API or ball ammo]

Of those 4 things, they are not weighted evenly.  Fuel and ammo take up a much larger portion of the plane.  The pilot is a small target.  Sawing through a wing spar or destroying all the control cables is difficult.  And anything ball ammo could do, API could do better.

I'm sure you can find the study yourself.
Currently ignoring Vraciu as he is a whoopeeed retard.

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2015, 03:39:52 PM »
API was more effective because many liquids in airplanes were flammable. When they leaked, they made small pools in the structure cavities or left flammable traces back to their origin. You cannot ignite a fuel tank internally very easily. You can ignite traces of fuel and any vapor in the structure cavities with the incendiary component of the API round. Having an HE round with delayed fuse go off in a fuel tank did not always make a giant boom.

This DoDD report was released in 1960 from testing started in WW2. Fascinating what it takes to get a plane to burn and to actually explode a fuel tank.

 www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA800109
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8097
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #7 on: October 27, 2015, 04:32:30 PM »
So lets break this down so that even you can understand.  In order to bring an enemy plane down, you had to:

(1)Cause detonation of its ammo. [Only API ammo]
(2)Ignite its fuel tanks. [Only API ammo]
(3)Kill the pilot [API or ball ammo]
(4)Destroy a critical structural member. [API or ball ammo]

Of those 4 things, they are not weighted evenly.  Fuel and ammo take up a much larger portion of the plane.  The pilot is a small target.  Sawing through a wing spar or destroying all the control cables is difficult.  And anything ball ammo could do, API could do better.

I'm sure you can find the study yourself.

Easy there, no insult intended.  I would've expected the load bearing structures or control cables to be more of a factor than they apparently are, is all.  Apologies.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline FLOOB

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3058
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #8 on: October 27, 2015, 05:22:13 PM »
If you didn't watch the video don't post in this thread.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans” - John Steinbeck

Offline FLOOB

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3058
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #9 on: October 27, 2015, 05:33:58 PM »
API was more effective
True, but more effective way does not = the only effective way, which apparently is what this study stated. I also read that most planes in wwII were downed by fire, but in AH as you know most planes are downed by dismemberment. And you're right all tracer ammo is essentially incendiary.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans” - John Steinbeck

Offline Groth

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 565
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #10 on: October 27, 2015, 06:06:42 PM »
 Fascinating.
           JGroth

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2015, 02:48:08 PM »
In the film they discovered without knowing what they discovered why the bullets have seemingly a delay before detonation. To allow the bullet to pass into the airframe or into a fuel tank. Hitting a pilot would be secondary to everything else. A tiny explosion in open structure cavities in many cases would be localized by the cavity space from 30cal rounds.
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2015, 09:45:41 PM »

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: Explosive rifle caliber ammo
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2015, 01:44:58 AM »
If you hit a pilot in the head did his head catch fire?
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.