Author Topic: Nearly smashed myself  (Read 1646 times)

Offline danny76

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #30 on: February 17, 2016, 04:48:05 AM »
Oh don't get me wrong, I think it's awesome you do this, just do it carefully :) 
Hell I turned 53 a few weeks back and I'm feeling, quite a lot, many motorcycle racing wrecks from when I was in my 20s.  Wouldn't trade it for anything, might have wished one or two wouldn't have happened, but for the most part walked from them all  :salute

The chunks of titanium screwed into in my bones hurt more and more as years go by.

Just replacing the steering head bearing in my bike at the moment, too sore to ride anything but a big old bus that puts no weight on my wrists nowadays but nevertheless I am looking forward to slinging my leg over the old girl again once the icy roads quit!

Motorcycling should be illegal as it is almost 100% addictive after a single use and can be dangerous. Like two wheeled crystal meth!
"You kill 'em all, I'll eat the BATCO!"
The GFC

"Not within a thousand years will man ever fly" - Wilbur Wright

Offline deSelys

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #31 on: February 18, 2016, 04:47:11 AM »
Duuude! You almost lost your perk points with this landing!

I won't comment on the swooping technique as I've never done it but I'd like to point an error (probably a typo) in what you said in your OP and I'd like to attract your attention on a possible cause of incident I wasn't aware of while skydiving and only learned about when I took up paragliding. Maybe you're already aware of this, but recent fatal incidents with experienced skydivers caused by wings collapsing near the ground (here and here) give me the impression that the info isn't common knowledge yet.

 
Quote
Equally, when you pull down on the rear risers you decrease the canopies angle of attack, allowing you to level out of a shallow dive and swoop along the ground with minimum drag, scraping your feet through the grass and looking cool.

Actually, pulling down on the rear risers will increase the AoA of your wing. And as the stall is only determined by the AoA, it is possible to stall your wing almost instantly with the rear risers, usually with a much smaller input than with the brakes. So kudos for keeping your wits and switching to the brakes instead of trying to dig yourself out of the corner by yanking on the rear risers, which would have probably ended much less nicely.

Now a bit of advice about flying a canopy with a decreased AoA in turbulent aerology: when you pull on the front risers (symetrically or not), you decrease the AoA of your wing (along the whole span or asymetrically). As you know, ram air canopies need pressurization (resulting from airspeed) to keep an efficient shape, and the cell openings are designed to maximize the pressurization when the airstream hits them at the standard AoA (when the risers aren't deformed).
So on one hand, you're gaining pressurization by the speed increase resulting from the dive initiated by the lower AoA, but on the other hand the airstream direction isn't entering the cell openings at the optimized angle so you're losing pressurization. The differential depends on the wing design but it is possible that, by diving with the front risers, your wing isn't as 'solid' (=pressurized) as in normal flight.
If a wing encounters at this moment a disturbance in the air mass (wind shear or turbulence) hitting the top part of the leading edge, it could be enough to cause a frontal collapse.

Now, paragliders are more prone to frontal collapses than skydiving canopies due to their lighter wing loading and essentially because they are flown more often in turbulent conditions (allowing them to gain altitude). Paraglider pilots are well aware of this phenomenon, and are taught to use the speed bar (allowing them to pull on the front risers to decrease the AoA) carefully when the air mass isn't calm.

However, a full or partial frontal collapse of a skydiving wing close to the ground leaves almost no room for recovery. Even if it is a rare event, the seriousness of the consequences  shouldn't allow the swoopers to disregard it. The danger zone, IMO, is a landing area downind of obstacles.

Keep us posted, and try to become an old skydiver please ;)
Current ID: Romanov

It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then it's just a game to find the eye

'I AM DID NOTHING WRONG' - Famous last forum words by legoman

Offline Rolex

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #32 on: February 18, 2016, 12:39:01 PM »
Live a little?

I jumped out of planes 20 years before you were born, Hamish. When real men used 2TU's and you had better have made the right decision when to exit because the wind decided your landing fate more than the blown out panels or girly, easy-mode square, ram air chutes or wings.

:)

Offline mechanic

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11327
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #33 on: February 18, 2016, 01:09:21 PM »
:D you win, Rolex, this round

Duuude! You almost lost your perk points with this landing!

I won't comment on the swooping technique as I've never done it but I'd like to point an error (probably a typo) in what you said in your OP and I'd like to attract your attention on a possible cause of incident I wasn't aware of while skydiving and only learned about when I took up paragliding. Maybe you're already aware of this, but recent fatal incidents with experienced skydivers caused by wings collapsing near the ground (here and here) give me the impression that the info isn't common knowledge yet.

 
Actually, pulling down on the rear risers will increase the AoA of your wing. And as the stall is only determined by the AoA, it is possible to stall your wing almost instantly with the rear risers, usually with a much smaller input than with the brakes. So kudos for keeping your wits and switching to the brakes instead of trying to dig yourself out of the corner by yanking on the rear risers, which would have probably ended much less nicely.

Now a bit of advice about flying a canopy with a decreased AoA in turbulent aerology: when you pull on the front risers (symetrically or not), you decrease the AoA of your wing (along the whole span or asymetrically). As you know, ram air canopies need pressurization (resulting from airspeed) to keep an efficient shape, and the cell openings are designed to maximize the pressurization when the airstream hits them at the standard AoA (when the risers aren't deformed).
So on one hand, you're gaining pressurization by the speed increase resulting from the dive initiated by the lower AoA, but on the other hand the airstream direction isn't entering the cell openings at the optimized angle so you're losing pressurization. The differential depends on the wing design but it is possible that, by diving with the front risers, your wing isn't as 'solid' (=pressurized) as in normal flight.
If a wing encounters at this moment a disturbance in the air mass (wind shear or turbulence) hitting the top part of the leading edge, it could be enough to cause a frontal collapse.

Now, paragliders are more prone to frontal collapses than skydiving canopies due to their lighter wing loading and essentially because they are flown more often in turbulent conditions (allowing them to gain altitude). Paraglider pilots are well aware of this phenomenon, and are taught to use the speed bar (allowing them to pull on the front risers to decrease the AoA) carefully when the air mass isn't calm.

However, a full or partial frontal collapse of a skydiving wing close to the ground leaves almost no room for recovery. Even if it is a rare event, the seriousness of the consequences  shouldn't allow the swoopers to disregard it. The danger zone, IMO, is a landing area downind of obstacles.

Keep us posted, and try to become an old skydiver please ;)

You are right, about the opposite AoA. I was thinking upside down, considering more dive as more AoA with regards to the ground. The inflation of the cells is usually no problem with front riser dives. However, a strong headwind can cause difficulties with partial collapses as well as sometimes forcing the canopy to stay in a dive longer as the wind hit the top surface of the cells. Most canopies now have inflation in mind when being designed and it is difficult to empty a cell in normal conditions. Some even have valve systems inside the cell openings to prevent depressurisation.

I believe paragliders and speedwings are very different in design and much more prone to violent stalls.

Rear riser control on landing is standard for swooping, the main risk is that of yanking the risers down too violently and causing a stall. With this canopy, sabre2 135 loaded around 1.3, it is considered safe to use the risers if used properly. The main problem with using them to recover a low dive is that the pressure is multiplied so much with the speed that adequate control is much more difficult if not impossible.

For sure, I was lucky. But this was not a canopy or weather issue, this was my poor decision making followed, luckily, by very quick good decision making. Suffice to say, I am one step closer to being an old skydiver through learning this lesson without paying the price.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2016, 01:11:19 PM by mechanic »
And I don't know much, but I do know this. With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Offline Curval

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11572
      • http://n/a
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #34 on: February 18, 2016, 05:40:28 PM »
I get the heebie jeebies reading this...lol

I jumped, once.  With one of those old round chutes, posted the pic here a few times.

Been there done it, scared the crap out of me but I survived.  All good. :bolt:
Some will fall in love with life and drink it from a fountain that is pouring like an avalanche coming down the mountain

Offline deSelys

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #35 on: February 19, 2016, 05:32:32 AM »
:D you win, Rolex, this round

You are right, about the opposite AoA. I was thinking upside down, considering more dive as more AoA with regards to the ground. The inflation of the cells is usually no problem with front riser dives. However, a strong headwind can cause difficulties with partial collapses as well as sometimes forcing the canopy to stay in a dive longer as the wind hit the top surface of the cells. Most canopies now have inflation in mind when being designed and it is difficult to empty a cell in normal conditions. Some even have valve systems inside the cell openings to prevent depressurisation.

I believe paragliders and speedwings are very different in design and much more prone to violent stalls.

Rear riser control on landing is standard for swooping, the main risk is that of yanking the risers down too violently and causing a stall. With this canopy, sabre2 135 loaded around 1.3, it is considered safe to use the risers if used properly. The main problem with using them to recover a low dive is that the pressure is multiplied so much with the speed that adequate control is much more difficult if not impossible.

For sure, I was lucky. But this was not a canopy or weather issue, this was my poor decision making followed, luckily, by very quick good decision making. Suffice to say, I am one step closer to being an old skydiver through learning this lesson without paying the price.

Yeah Rolex, big  :aok for jumping those jurassic-era rounds ;)

Mechanic, I should have said that there are indeed lots of positive things in your video: ok, you somewhat fubared your swoop (entry too low or rotation held for too long, i can't say) but you didn't take long to recognize the danger you got yourself in and you reacted super fast and adequately. And before all that, you had the wisdom to pick up a canopy size and type adapted to your skill level  :aok

And I agree that your 'incident' had nothing to do with atmospheric conditions, I just wanted to share some knowledge that I missed during my skydiving days.

2 points I'd like to make:

1) I don't think that paragliders stall more violently than skydiving canopies, and I think it's the contrary for type A and B wings, designed for docility. The longer lines will store more pendular energy which will have to be dissipated by active piloting, and the higher aspect ratio of the planform will make them more prone to cravats and other niceties, but OTOH the bigger inertia will dampen the reactions. Speedflying wings are usually as small as swooping canopies and I won't comment about those as I have zero experience.

Here is a video of a 'big' skydiving canopy stalled intentionally with toggles: even with slow input, the reaction is brisk (especially the yaw)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3XmrH_9n6Q

2) ref 'strong headwind': wind force and direction won't have the slightest influence on your canopy behaviour as long as they don't change drastically. When flying in a moving mass of air, only your ground path will be influenced. So your swoop will obviously be longer when flying downind than upwind, but your recovery arc and the height needed to flare will be exactly the same! :old: Or maybe I misunderstood you?

Here is a video of a swooping canopy held with a bit of fronts hitting the burble (wake turbulence) of a wingsuit... Yikes!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQ8WJBNh-qg&feature=youtu.be&t=58

And for giggles, a vid of one of my flights during a SIV course (flight incidents simulation)... Or how to share the experience of the laundry in the tumble dryer....

« Last Edit: February 19, 2016, 05:36:00 AM by deSelys »
Current ID: Romanov

It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then it's just a game to find the eye

'I AM DID NOTHING WRONG' - Famous last forum words by legoman

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7294
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #36 on: February 19, 2016, 12:54:52 PM »
If you ever find yourself thinking, "Hey guys, check this out!", then STOP!  Nothing good comes after that phrase.
Or...Hold my beer and watch this!
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline Bear76

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4169
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #37 on: February 19, 2016, 01:18:21 PM »
The good ole days when I could walk through the airport metal detector without alerting Home Land Security.

Offline mechanic

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11327
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #38 on: February 20, 2016, 01:00:35 PM »
Yeah Rolex, big  :aok for jumping those jurassic-era rounds ;)

Mechanic, I should have said that there are indeed lots of positive things in your video: ok, you somewhat fubared your swoop (entry too low or rotation held for too long, i can't say) but you didn't take long to recognize the danger you got yourself in and you reacted super fast and adequately. And before all that, you had the wisdom to pick up a canopy size and type adapted to your skill level  :aok

And I agree that your 'incident' had nothing to do with atmospheric conditions, I just wanted to share some knowledge that I missed during my skydiving days.

2 points I'd like to make:

1) I don't think that paragliders stall more violently than skydiving canopies, and I think it's the contrary for type A and B wings, designed for docility. The longer lines will store more pendular energy which will have to be dissipated by active piloting, and the higher aspect ratio of the planform will make them more prone to cravats and other niceties, but OTOH the bigger inertia will dampen the reactions. Speedflying wings are usually as small as swooping canopies and I won't comment about those as I have zero experience.

Here is a video of a 'big' skydiving canopy stalled intentionally with toggles: even with slow input, the reaction is brisk (especially the yaw)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3XmrH_9n6Q

2) ref 'strong headwind': wind force and direction won't have the slightest influence on your canopy behaviour as long as they don't change drastically. When flying in a moving mass of air, only your ground path will be influenced. So your swoop will obviously be longer when flying downind than upwind, but your recovery arc and the height needed to flare will be exactly the same! :old: Or maybe I misunderstood you?

Here is a video of a swooping canopy held with a bit of fronts hitting the burble (wake turbulence) of a wingsuit... Yikes!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQ8WJBNh-qg&feature=youtu.be&t=58

And for giggles, a vid of one of my flights during a SIV course (flight incidents simulation)... Or how to share the experience of the laundry in the tumble dryer....




Man, that paragliding looks a lot of fun .But for sure it looks like the end cell stalls are far more violent and long lasting than a skydive canopy. Speedflying is a whole new kettle of fish, and seriously dangerous with instant and unpredictable stalls. The skydive wing at the size I'm currently flying by comparison is very easy to feel riding right up to and over the edge as far as input stalls are concerned. Turbulence stall not so easy, but learning to spot or predict the turbulence ahead of time is a good prevention.

Really nice recovery on your paraglider, I love the way when you get stable the cells just pop open one by one all down the wing.

I appreciate the advice and discussion, it all helps to keep me in one piece.

If you thought my mistake was dangerous, check out this lunatic on a speedwing...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl3iKGd4Yqo

truly beautiful and utterly insane.
And I don't know much, but I do know this. With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Offline mechanic

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11327
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2016, 06:35:40 PM »
 Oh and two points I forgot: A strong headwind can certainly prolong the recovery arc of your canopy, though for me it's is not a big issue at my amateur level. For the pro swoopers it can make a difference because the turn so steep that the wind is hitting nothing but the top of the canopy. Having spent some time here with competition level swoopers this is definitely true.
 Also, the wingsuit burble hitting the canopy is far stronger than your average atmospheric turbulence. Having flown a wingsuit in another's burble I can confirm that the turbulence behind a wingsuit is horrific.

S!
And I don't know much, but I do know this. With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.

Offline JimmyC

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5196
Re: Nearly smashed myself
« Reply #40 on: February 21, 2016, 09:46:56 PM »
Now do it on a pony Ya rustler!!

Awesome Buddy, grinning for ya.. :D
CO 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy."