Author Topic: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year  (Read 577 times)

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9897
Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« on: March 02, 2016, 02:47:04 PM »
It's finally becoming a commercial reality.


Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6437
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2016, 03:39:00 PM »
That's a bit large to be called a jetpack, don't you think?   It's bigger than a Fiat.
"Then out spake brave Horatius, the Captain of the gate:
 To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late.
 And how can man die better, than facing fearful odds.
 For the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods."

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2016, 04:24:05 PM »
Didn't they use those in "Men in Black III"? :D

Seriously, thought, I want one! Wonder what kind of range it has? I've got a 40-mile commute, one-way, which takes me an hour by car (if traffic and weather is good). This is small enough to fit in a standard parking space. After all, I'm tired of waiting for my flying car, which was promised to us half a century ago! :airplane:
« Last Edit: March 02, 2016, 04:28:51 PM by Sabre »
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9897
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2016, 05:39:14 PM »
General characteristics

Crew: 1 pilot
Payload: 120 kg ()
Length: 5 ft 7 in (1.75 m)
Rotor diameter: ()
Height: 7 ft (2.2 m)
Max. takeoff weight: 320 kg (320kg)
Powerplant: 1 × Martin Aircraft Company 2-litre (120 cu in) two-stroke V-4 engine, 200 hp (150 kw)
Propellers: Carbon / Kevlar composite - ducted fans in each engine propeller
Fuel capacity: 45 Litres
Performance

Maximum speed: 74 km/h
Cruise speed: 56 km/h
Stall speed: 0 km/h (0 km/h)
Range: 30–40 km ()
Combat radius: @74 km/h + 5 min rev = 56 km ()
Endurance: 30 min to 50 min
Service ceiling: 3,000 ft amsl ()
Rate of climb: 400 fpm ()
sink rate: 400 fpm ()

Offline Bear76

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4163
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2016, 07:48:09 PM »
Propeller Pack

Offline USRanger

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10325
      • BoP Home
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2016, 10:25:40 PM »
The future of airborne troops.
Axis vs Allies Staff Member
☩ JG11 Sonderstaffel ☩
Flying 'Black[Death] 10' ☩JG11☩

Only the Proud, Only the Strong Ne Desit Virtus

Offline deSelys

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2016, 05:12:51 AM »
I wonder what's the min height requirement for a successful ballistic emergency parachute deployment.

It looks to me that under 200 ft AGL, you're basically doomed in the event of an engine or ducted fan failure.

And I haven't seen any flotation devices listed in the safety items... The thing doesn't look even remotely buoyant and I wouldn't fancy a water landing. :old:
Current ID: Romanov

It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then it's just a game to find the eye

'I AM DID NOTHING WRONG' - Famous last forum words by legoman

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23889
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2016, 08:31:03 AM »
Payload: 120 kg ()


Dam, that rules me out  :mad:
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Gman

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3731
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #8 on: March 03, 2016, 11:49:13 AM »
I posted this here in the fall - much smaller working Jetpack, no idea if it is as far along as the Martin in terms of production though.



There are more vids of it on the channel and YT in general.

I do wonder about the practical use of these things - any engine or control failure over terrain that ISN't water, or ever from a certain height over water would = pretty assured death, I know from high angle assault courses that falls over 5m typically = huge injuries or fatal, and flying that high would probably feel "low" in one of these rigs.  Fun though, but again, I'd be worried about engine failures especially, you aren't exactly aerodynamic and able to glide without wings, nor is there stored energy in a rotor to autorate - you're flying a safe once one of those engines quit I'd imagine.  Splat.  Or sploosh.  Even sploosh you would have to get out of your harness very fast not to be dragged under and drown I bet.

I understand the attraction though, for certain.  I tried one of those hydrodynamic water powered ones long ago, and was hooked, instantly. 
« Last Edit: March 03, 2016, 12:00:02 PM by Gman »

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9897
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #9 on: March 03, 2016, 07:53:52 PM »
That is pretty cool. Main differences seem to be endurance (Martin goes 50 min vs that 10), and payload - I believe the martin is being designed to allow a 120kg payload in addition to the pilot (not 100% sure).

Also the Martin includes a ballistic chute. There's a video of them trialing a prototype with it on youtube.

Offline BuckShot

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1721
Re: Martin Jetpack due to ship this year
« Reply #10 on: March 03, 2016, 10:03:56 PM »
The glide angle after losing an engine is very steep.
Game handle: HellBuck