Your saying in AH2 that all fighters had 50's? That would be incorrect.
1) It should take a lot of bombs to take a strat down, why should the actions of 1 person have great effect on many? Set up a mission and hit a strat with 4-6 sets, that would be much more realistic.
2) I love the clouds, and I think many do. They can also be used to your advantage ya know.
3) Anyone, who paid attention to the maps in AH2 could track bombers with ease, just by watching bar dar. One of the best I knew at doing that has posted in this very thread.
4) Know the maps, understand the base layouts. That makes having to make big adjustments on approach to target.
5) Never knew we had big wind layers in the MA's in AH2 on any regular basis, my bad I suppose.
6) I have not done a lot of bombing in AH3 yet, but I know the same holds true from a GV perspective. From 14k I would guess they had the same issues in WWII for real.
7) My personal logic here is simple, if 1 guy can take them down, why should the opposite not apply?
A number of times over the years, there has been the running question of is AH a "game" as you put it? Or is it a simulation? I think there is a big difference in the 2...... I tend to believe the latter personally.
Good luck
