Author Topic: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense  (Read 5487 times)

Offline pembquist

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1928
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #15 on: November 26, 2017, 06:02:52 PM »
OK Bozon you don't have an excuse anymore, get out your checkbook and start tooling up: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-40873628
Pies not kicks.

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2017, 01:31:53 AM »
Problem is the speed of the mossie, against a tank it will need a shallower angle than the IL-2 so it offset a bit of the hitting power. But just add it as an option to the Mk VI and let people decide for themselves what gun they want, there is no need to create a new model imo.
XVIII also added more armor to the mossie. I don't think the game can change that in the hangar. It will be relatively cheap to make this variant, since much of the 3D model will be identical to our VI.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2017, 01:36:43 AM »
OK Bozon you don't have an excuse anymore, get out your checkbook and start tooling up: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-north-east-wales-40873628
I am already in the midst of a tree felling rampage for this project.
The estimated cost is 7m pounds. My kids are wearing rags, and I have eaten nothing but potato peels since August. By 2068 I should be able to afford it.  :aok
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23926
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #18 on: November 27, 2017, 01:43:08 AM »
Yes it had to use AP to penetrate a U boat's hull.

Makes sense  :old:
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #19 on: November 27, 2017, 02:42:12 AM »
Makes sense  :old:
Also,  you need an AP round in order to be able to hole the hull below the water line. HE will just explode on impact with the water.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Zimme83

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #20 on: November 27, 2017, 08:25:22 AM »
You dont need to make the hole below the water line, any hole will make the sub unable to dive and thus be an easy target for the sub hunters..
''The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge'' - Stephen Hawking

Offline atlau

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1221
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #21 on: November 27, 2017, 09:05:13 AM »
You dont need to make the hole below the water line, any hole will make the sub unable to dive and thus be an easy target for the sub hunters..

Nonsense. The sub can actually dive faster with the extra 57mm holes!

Offline Zimme83

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #22 on: November 27, 2017, 10:14:38 AM »
Nonsense. The sub can actually dive faster with the extra 57mm holes!

...Cannot argue with that..
''The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge'' - Stephen Hawking

Offline pangea

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 164
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #23 on: November 28, 2017, 07:56:01 AM »
This....

Beaufughter first by far.  Hunt subs with 25Hs if you need a big cannon


Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #24 on: November 28, 2017, 09:21:48 AM »
Who said that the Beau and Mossie XVIII are mutually exclusive?
The Beau is my #1 on the list of planes curently not at all represented in AH (closely followed by the Whirlwind).

Hunting subs in B25... well, if the sub slows down enough, I suppose it is possible. But this is like saying "You don't need a Ferrari, you can just drive a Toyota pickup like ISIS does".
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline DaveBB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #25 on: November 28, 2017, 03:23:01 PM »
The B-25 was an incredible ship destroyer in the Pacific.  The B-25H was even equipped with a radar guided gunsight for it's 75mm in an experimental form.  It was extremely accurate.  In one test, the radar locked onto the steel mast of a ship, and it was severed with a direct hit from the 75mm.

But it still wasn't as effective as bombing.  A long straight cannon run left the B-25 vulnerable and at most allowed about 7 rounds to be fired.  The goal was to put out as much ordnance in the least amount of time possible.  Skip-bombing, para-frags, and 8 forward firing 50 cals were the best for that.  No reason to linger around the enemy too long.
Currently ignoring Vraciu as he is a whoopeeed retard.

Offline Vulcan

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9910
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #26 on: November 29, 2017, 02:31:40 PM »
The B-25 was an incredible ship destroyer in the Pacific.  The B-25H was even equipped with a radar guided gunsight for it's 75mm in an experimental form.  It was extremely accurate.  In one test, the radar locked onto the steel mast of a ship, and it was severed with a direct hit from the 75mm.

Sorry Dave but my BS meter is pegging out that radar story. WW2 radar was pretty primitiveThe 75mm wasn't gimbaled so how you'd "lock on" to anything is beyond me.

The only reference I can find too B25H radar is the AN/APQ-13 which could be used as a bombing impact predictor or for ranging adjustments where the radar operator made manual adjustments to the pilots gunsight based on the AN/APQ-13 data. The pilot still had to aim the gun using the aircraft.

Offline DaveBB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1356
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #27 on: November 30, 2017, 07:59:40 PM »
I lost it in a fire, but details of the radar aiming system were found in the book "Warpath across the Pacific".  You are correct in that the pilot still had to aim the aircraft, but the gunsight was adjusted by radar.  It wasn't used operationally, just experimentally.
Currently ignoring Vraciu as he is a whoopeeed retard.

Offline RODBUSTR

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 473
Re: Mosquito FB XVIII 57mm Coastal Defense
« Reply #28 on: January 03, 2018, 05:45:54 PM »
    To prevent damage from their own gun, The Minimum firing distance of the 57mm in the mossy was 600 yards.   I the plane does come to AH3 , It would be nice to be able to adjust the sights out to 1500 yards to try to keep It somewhat in line with a real one.... It would be nice for the B25H too.