Try the G with 25% and droppers. Even more powerful engines, larger rudders and faster. Just the weight getting in the way of maneuvering so, 25% and droppers. If you are feeling guilty at that point, take the small gun packaged and only shoot with the 2 MG151/20 as penance towards your uberhood.
C engines 1100hp and the differences in the 601 variations from the D-E still give you a dog ride. F engines 1350hp, G engines 1475hp, roughly 125hp, I can see why we got only the C and G. And why it's seductive to want a C style air frame with 250hp more oomph per engine in the MA. I can understand the scenario CM's hoping Hitech would introduce an F with 1350hp engines. In the MA, if you really want to be a 110 ace, the more engine the better as we all know how the MA works.
As is today, the MA makes a lot of pretty rides hanger queens due to the realities of the game.
I wonder if Lusche ever came up with tables showing the ROI on 3D models introduced into the MA. I doubt Hitech would ever tell us Waffle's yearly cost and what it costs to produce a new ride so Lusche could create the ROI graph. I suspect Hitech knows to the penny along with a good educated guess what the usage will end up being at least with airplanes. Tanks even threw me across creating 4 terrains to support them. I never expected the GV part of the game to become T34\85's are us, so I tried to help get other rides out of the hanger with fjordma. Actually saw some of those German jag cockroaches and turtles being used again on fjordma becasue the trees and topography encouraged their use. The MA in the air is pretty obvious in it's current generation of play style.
