Author Topic: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong  (Read 684 times)

Offline Sundowner

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1005
Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« on: April 10, 2020, 10:02:57 AM »
The chain of events leading to this mishap is astounding! It reminded me of a quote from the 'TAC-ATTACk' magazine available among TAC wings in the 80s:

"By the book or buy the farm."

                                Regards,
                                    Sun



Report Released on French Rafale Passenger’s Accidental Ejection Reveals Both Human And Technical Failures

You may recall an unusual incident from Mar. 20, 2019, when a civilian passenger riding in a two-seat Armée de l’Air Dassault Rafale ejected from the aircraft while the pilot flying remained at the controls, despite his canopy being jettisoned, and managed to make an emergency landing. The report from the incident has just been released by French officials, and it makes for bizarre reading.

The incident took place near the Saint-Dizier 113 airbase in eastern France, where the flight originated from.

According to the accident investigation findings by the French Investigation Bureau for State Aviation Safety (BEA-E), and a summary of that report published on aerotime.aero by reporter Clement Charpentreau (h/t to Aviation Week‘s Steve Trimble who posted the link on Twitter), the flight began as a civilian “incentive” flight granted to non-military passengers who may have a supporting role in aircraft operations and for journalists in the aviation industry (by the way, make sure you read this article published by our Editor David Cenciotti about flying as a journalist in the backseat of a fighter jet).

The report identified the passenger as, “A 64-year-old employee of a French defense manufacturer,” Who, according to the report, “was offered a discovery flight on a Dassault Rafale B fighter jet as a surprise by four of his colleagues, including a former pilot of the French Air Force that organized the gift.”

The sequence of factors that contributed to the accident accumulated almost immediately from the start. They included skipping some required medical checks for a high-performance tactical jet passenger. The passenger who fired his ejection seat was cleared for the flight only four hours prior, and only under the condition that he not be subjected to negative G’s during the flight. The medical examination also limited the G factor to +3 for this passenger, but the doctor failed to communicate with the pilot, who proceeded to an usual take off at more than 4G, then 0.6G negative.

Part of the report indicated that the passenger may have only accepted the aircraft ride under pressure from peers who arranged the surprise flight. Upon entering the aircraft, the passenger’s heart rate was, “recorded between 136 and 142 beats per minute.” And that, “The investigation found that the safety checks of the passenger had been approximate at best.”

During the critical adjustment of the retention harness for the Martin-Baker MK16 ejection seat in the back seat of the Rafale, the passenger was not cross-checked by ground crew and had not tightened the harness adequately on his own. He had also not donned his G-suit pants correctly and his helmet and oxygen mask were unbuckled. From here, the incident unwound rapidly once the flight began.

According the original French language report translated to English, “Following orders of a regular training mission that involved two other Rafales, the pilot took off and climbed at 47°, generating a load factor of around +4G. Then, as he leveled off, he subjected his passenger to a negative load factor of about -0.6G.” This is where problems from the harness not being tight enough contributed to the accident sequence.”

The translated report went on to reveal, “Discovering the feeling of the negative load factor, the insufficiently strapped and totally surprised passenger held onto the ejector handle and activated it unintentionally.”

The report then said, “During the ejection, the civilian lost his helmet and oxygen mask. Due to a technical flaw of the seat, the dinghy failed to inflate, but fortunately, the incident happened above land. The passenger sustained minor injuries.”

Ironically (more or less), it was a technical malfunction that prevented the pilot from also being ejected from the aircraft along with the rear-seat passenger. The normal ejection sequence for a Dassault Rafale two-seat aircraft would cause both crew members to be ejected even if only one initiates the ejection sequence. This means the rear seat passenger accidentally pulling the ejection seat handle between their legs should have ejected the pilot as well. In this bizarre incident, both the front and rear canopies were disintegrated and ejected by explosive charge, the rear seat left the aircraft, but the pilot’s seat remained inside the aircraft. In other words, a technical glitch saved the aircraft....

Full Article:

https://theaviationist.com/2020/04/09/report-released-on-french-rafale-passengers-accidental-ejection-reveals-both-human-and-technical-failures/



Freedom implies risk. Less freedom implies more risk.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13896
Re: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2020, 10:22:53 AM »
 :O
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2020, 10:46:04 AM »
Hehe, didn't inform the pilot? It's like us exporting our defense contractors to our sworn enemy. What could go wrong?
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17722
Re: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2020, 12:03:44 PM »
The 80lbs of crap in his pants cushioned his landing

<S>

Eagler
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti FTW3 | Vive Pro | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder Pedals

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12719
Re: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2020, 12:15:17 PM »
The pilots seat couldnt eject because his balls of steel were too heavy
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12339
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2020, 12:19:39 PM »
I once unintentionally put a passenger at -2.5 on a 4 point roll. The pilot would have never noticed the -0.6 because of the number of times he did it. I hadn't really noticed the -2.5 because is was only a short correction to bring the nose up at the inverted stop.

My passenger sure felt it and when I saw the g meter min needle later I apologized profusely. This was also his 2nd aerobatic ride with me.

HiTech

Offline turt21

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 623
Re: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2020, 02:50:09 PM »
. This was also his 2nd aerobatic ride with me.

HiTech
[/quote]

was it his last?

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2020, 08:59:03 PM »
Pilot probably didn't eject because there is usually a selector switch in the back seat, to determine if a rear seat ejection will also eject the front seat.  On orientation/incentive rides in the USAF, that switch is usually put into the isolated position so the guy in back can't eject the pilot by accident.
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline hazmatt

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1363
Re: Incentive Flight Gone Wrong
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2020, 09:12:01 PM »
Ironically (more or less), it was a technical malfunction that prevented the pilot from also being ejected from the aircraft along with the rear-seat passenger. The normal ejection sequence for a Dassault Rafale two-seat aircraft would cause both crew members to be ejected even if only one initiates the ejection sequence. This means the rear seat passenger accidentally pulling the ejection seat handle between their legs should have ejected the pilot as well. In this bizarre incident, both the front and rear canopies were disintegrated and ejected by explosive charge, the rear seat left the aircraft, but the pilot’s seat remained inside the aircraft. In other words, a technical glitch saved the aircraft.

Also said the pilot quickly exited the aircraft as the ejection sequence had already been initiated.