Projection of adoration indicates that your opinion, regarding my use of it in this case, has a degree of emotional drive. I indicated no such thing and merely offered it as an easily accessed source. As I've said various sources differ in opinion (and I'll be glad to add accuracy). As such, I try taking them all with a grain of salt. No attempt was made to bruise the professional sensibilities of a fellow historian.
Sorry, but that disclaimer is BS when he uses footage of a completely different aircraft than what's being discussed. I can overlook using a Yak-3 in the Yak-9 video since they're both Yaks that are similar looking, but I won't forgive using footage of totally unrelated material to the subject at hand. (I wish I could remember the specific instance that set me off a few months ago but it was essentially the equivalent of showing a P-51 on screen while the narration is going over the demands of landing on an aircraft carrier) Not even close to relevant. It demonstrates a lack of knowledge on the subject matter and a lack of care in producing a video of any educational value. If he misses the basic stuff, what else did he get wrong?
You have spammed their videos all over this board, I interpret that as adoration. If I am wrong, I beg your forgiveness.
Forgiveness given.
Thanks for your opinion/recommendation. I'm looking forward to you 'spamming' us with superior material. Seriously. I'm sure most all of us will appreciate it. I know I will.
You are right, I won't be providing superior material. Keep doing you, broseph
Broseph? Huh. Youth these days.
Broseph is pretty old, from my college days.
My college days are more recent than yours (though my age is likely older than you). The word has no real meaning to me. *ShruG* Your interaction with me, at this point, seems fruitless.
As is the majority of yours but that doesn't slow you down
I don't really care. I was just commenting on how poor the content was, scholastically. Keep posting videos from the channel, free to do what you want, of course.
