I’m curious as to what’s is the endgame for the United States here?
I think the strategic thinking is pretty well outlined in the Zeihan video I linked earlier.
https://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,406880.msg5388718.html#msg5388718The assumption is that Ukraine is no more the end target than was Chechnya, or Georgia, or Crimea. Putin's end goal is to extend his territory until it reclaims the geographically defensible choke points controlled by the previous Soviet Union.
Unfortunately that means that the next targets will be NATO allies (Poland, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, etc) which we are bound by NATO treaty to defend will American troops. That has a higher chance of causing a nuclear exchange than having Ukraine defeat them.
Our end game in Ukraine is to either help the Ukrainians stop them cold there in their territory, or help them kill and destroy enough of the Russian offensive capability that they might have to take another decade to recover and refit for the next stage of their plan of conquest.
If they have to take a decade to lick their wounds, a lot of things could happen in that time that might avert a larger catastrophe. They might have a change in government that is more interested in making money doing business with the West instead of invading them. Look at WWII Germany vs the stable rule-of-law post war Germany.
If they don't pause, then at least the Ukrainians have degraded enough of the Russian military that is will be even easier for us to destroy them when they move on to Poland, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, etc. That means less American deaths later.