As I said in a previous post, I am familiar with the design. Given that the Dali is not a large container ship and the incredible amount of kinetic energy that needs to be absorbed in incidents like this, I would rather hope that things like this never happen again instead of making statements like "im sure the bridge in Tampa would survive a similar collision". Engineers are not always right.
Im just answering your question sir
For the record im not in anyway hoping for a ship to crash into the tampa bay skyway bridge, I think we all hope that this never happens again. BUT if accident were to happen that bridge would stand a hell of a lot better chance than the bridge in Baltimore...
From your logic we shouldn't build ships to have more life boats than the Titanic or have true watertight bulkheads either, because if we hope hard enough and wish upon a falling star an iceberg will never find its way in the path of an oceanliner again.