<blank stare> some comments here are frankly just polarized blind devotion views, ya know like normal.
I can’t read the whole thread.
Some refuse to think more than 5 min ahead.
Article 1 & 2
It’s always good when a bad leader is taken out
Does anyone think who is taking charge next? Plan is a much more hardliner is set to take control. No more than 5 minutes of thought was put into that.
Attacks will likely be here, like 9/11. We are not invincible, to think so is foolish. Releasing biological warfare can be done with a balloon. An army didn’t take towers down in NYC. Afgan leaders didn’t do it a terrorist group did. Hezbollah and others come to mind
Telling the Iranians to take their country back. What are they gonna do throw their shoes at a well armed military? They don’t have 500 million guns like the USA. They have almost no means to do so. No more than 5 minutes of thought was put into that.
You can’t change an regime with zero boots on the ground. Venezuela regime was not replaced, it’s the same regime and there were boots on the ground.
Again, good they are dead, but like Iraq and Afghanistan then end game didn’t exist, nor does it here.
Some sad no politics while your whole stance is based on politics. There’s no cognitive convo here, its all biased and predictable.
Great strike, bad end game planning, if any at all.
Should it have happened? Yep. By this group of half-wits? Probably not, we are about to find out. Could be 1 yr could be 20 yrs. They fixed the current situation, broke laws doing it, not the future.
It’s also a convenient distraction, again.
it’s 100% predictable. These two sides can’t agree on what color the sky is. Throw a few Q comments and off the rails it goes.
A no wars president attacked or threatened 7 countries, some our allies. Concept blown.
So much for low gas prices
