Author Topic: is the 190A-5 considered an early war fighter?  (Read 6124 times)

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24060
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: is the 190A-5 considered an early war fighter?
« Reply #15 on: June 13, 2026, 11:05:41 AM »
I don't remember the ME 410 being in the MW.

Because it wasn't. You spotted an error in my list  :old:

(For the record, it should have been, because the 410A was doing attack missions to England from mid 1943 on and was phased out from Reichsverteidigung in the summer of 44.)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4987
      • Gospel Web
Re: is the 190A-5 considered an early war fighter?
« Reply #16 on: June 13, 2026, 02:39:48 PM »
 :aok Maybe my memory isn't as bad as I thought.  :salute
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9705
Re: is the 190A-5 considered an early war fighter?
« Reply #17 on: June 13, 2026, 08:28:06 PM »
Maybe my memory isn't as bad as I thought.


And maybe this is a sign of the Great Cataclysm. 

Lusche committed an error.

Think about that.

Tremble.

- oldman

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24060
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: is the 190A-5 considered an early war fighter?
« Reply #18 on: June 13, 2026, 09:11:21 PM »
Lusche committed an error.


That’s not actually all that rare.  :old:
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1257
Re: is the 190A-5 considered an early war fighter?
« Reply #19 on: June 14, 2026, 07:53:40 PM »
The old MW arena had all of the EW planes plus:

Unfortunately I don't remember exactly the perked ones. I know the Typhoon was a perk plane in MW, and I think the Spitfire VIII was one, too.

Thanks Lusche, much appreciated!

Badboy
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired