Author Topic: E vs C  (Read 4198 times)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
E vs C
« Reply #255 on: February 19, 2002, 04:15:47 PM »

Thanks Tumor........

Arcon...Please look into it before passing judgement.

Top three reasons to believe big bang cosmology

1. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis - Models of the possible outcomes of photons becoming quarks becoming subatomic particles becoming nuclei of simple atoms like Hydrogen, Lithium and Helium seem to agree with a big bang cosmology.

2. Cosmic Microwave Background - A measure of the leftover energy from a "big bang".
 
3. Hubble Expansion - Noted originally by Hubble in 1927, the red shift of objects in space proving they are racing away from us at a high rate of speed.

Offline mrfish

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2343
E vs C
« Reply #256 on: February 19, 2002, 05:11:01 PM »
this thread is like chuckie.

Offline gavor

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
      • http://users.senet.com.au/~shanga
E vs C
« Reply #257 on: February 19, 2002, 05:15:11 PM »
This thread is like last nights curry and beer.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
E vs C
« Reply #258 on: May 03, 2002, 03:05:33 PM »
Now THIS is a lunker!:D

Offline nuchpatrick

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1062
      • http://www.361stvfg.com
E vs C
« Reply #259 on: May 03, 2002, 03:17:39 PM »
But what about the Aliens? :eek:

Offline loser

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1642
E vs C
« Reply #260 on: May 03, 2002, 10:03:04 PM »
i am eagerly awaiting this community's answer to a question that existed since time began. Perhaps it could be put to a poll?

:rolleyes:


I myself tend to lean towards the creationist side of the coin, which is suprising considering when i was younger GOING to church was more important than the sermon or what you learned.


The reason? It is more interesting...more things in this world have been achieved due to blind faith and believing than can ever be chocked upped to a bunch of white coats in a lab.

or, we can look at Descartes' "i think there for i am."

that one line makes more sense than any biology textbook that i have ever read.

-btw i think that was Descartes, i have a terrible memory placing lines to philosophers.

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
SAVE US JEBUS!
« Reply #261 on: May 03, 2002, 11:06:37 PM »
:rolleyes:
« Last Edit: May 03, 2002, 11:56:26 PM by weazel »

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
E vs C
« Reply #262 on: May 04, 2002, 11:06:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by loser
The reason? It is more interesting...more things in this world have been achieved due to blind faith and believing than can ever be chocked upped to a bunch of white coats in a lab.


Name three.
sand

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
E vs C
« Reply #263 on: May 04, 2002, 05:39:42 PM »
Jesus, certainly saved my soul from a terrble hell. I am grateful for it. I am shocked at the amount of posts in this thread (well kind of, this subject has always been a hot one).  To me its not debatable. God did it, He said it, and that good enough for me. Gen 1:1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth

It doesnt expalin why He did, or how he did, whether it is some explainable phenomenon. Or that a day in God's eyes is longer than one of our days. He just did. I love it:). This is the God I want to believe in and follow and worship.
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
Wow, how did I miss this thread?
« Reply #264 on: May 05, 2002, 02:58:21 AM »
Now, Ill admit right off the bat that reading 6 pages of this stuff may have caused me to misinterperate soe of the posts... I feel required to throw my two cents in either way.  :P

There are some possibilites I have "come up with."

1.  Religion is social control, invented by man.
2.  Religion is man's attempt at explaining things that actually did occur, but couldnt be understood.
3.  Religion is true as taught.

In order of importance - this is what I lean towards in terms of my opinion.

3.  As taught, religion is not true.
2.  Many of the events explained in the Bible may have occured, but man's attempt to explain them is flawed.
1.  This is too deep to be true, methinks.  Would require WAY too much effort.

Big Bang Theory:  Absolutely true, period.  We all know the theory, and it have been explained here - universe expands rapidly and creates various elements integral to the formation of stars.  Matter not condensed into stars forms "dust" between systems or planets orbiting stars.  Universe is still expanding, but the expansion is strange.  As time goes on, everything is moving away from everything else at ever increasing speeds - there is no clear "center."  Stars and galaxies "ahead" of us are picking up speed and increasing distance and stars "behind" us are increasing speed at a rate slower than us - falling behind.  (redshift intensity).  The only theory that was open to debate before 1980 was the "Big Crunch" or "Big Freeze."  The Big Crunch Theory states that the force of the initial expansion would eventually be halted by gravity and the universe would collapse in on itself resulting in another "Big Bang."  The Big Freeze Theory states that the force of the initial expansion is greater than the gravity that would be necessary to halt, and recall the expansion.  99% of astonomers now agree that the universe will continuously expand until the stars are so far apart that they are not visable from one system to the next.  The "death" of the universe and its life will not be molten and dense, but cold and empty.

"Creation" of Life:  Heres how it works... universe expands, stars are formed... hydrogen, helium, light elements rule the day.  Once the stars begin to die, and nova, heavy elements are created (read, carbon).  The Supernova is the ONLY event in the universe that can create elements heavy enough (through massive heat and density) to support material life as we know it.  So quite literally, we are "made from the stars."  The creation of life is not simply a "chemical process."  It requires a VERY delacate set of conditions that must be met (life as we know it at least).  Temperate climate, water, hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, etc... these must be STABLE conditions... millions of years worth of stability - variations of planet orbit or planet evolution (physical evolution) will destroy the process.  Im willing to bet that life - nevermind intelligent life - is so rare in our galaxy that... say there are maybe only 50,000 planets orbiting stars in our galaxy that can support life as it occured on Earth (Terra if you want to get into "non-ecocretric speak"... might as well start refering to "The Sun" as Sol too.)  :P  Anyway - the claim that we are the only life forms in this galaxy is about as rediculous as saying "humans are the only species on this planet."  There are more stars in our galaxy than there are grains of sand on every beach on Earth and there are more galaxies in this universe than there are stars in our galaxy... never mind the mathmatical possibilties of parallel or co-existing/multiple universes.

Bottom Line:  There are so many possibilities we must consider, and closed mindedness is not the way to seek the answers to our questions.  "God did it, it says so in Luke 3:13" is not an answer - but neither is "God doesnt exist."  Personally I dont think its too far fetched to consider the possibility that Jesus was an extra-terrerstrial visitor and his "miracles" were simply not understood.  Look at the stories:  
1.  Sodam and Gamorah (spelling?) - how many of you knew that there is actually radioactive material in the ground at the Bibilcal locations of these two cities?  
2.  The Museum of Bahgdad houses an electric battery carbon dated to over 10,000 years old.  Correct me if Im wrong, but we didnt have this capacity at that time.
3.  City of Atlantis... the "City of Gold (read, metal)" - what do you think about a temporary garrison?  It wasnt swallowed by the sea, they upped and left.
4.  Similarities between religions - they all have a messenger, supreme being, rules, a return prophecy, copulation between "angels" and humans, and fantastic stories of men and machines which could do the impossible (Chariots of fire that could fly).
 --With that in mind... ask yourself what we would do if we visited a planet housing intelligent life that was perhaps at a neandrothal level of evolution?  We would:
1.  Arrive and proclaim ourselves as astronauts from Earth.  We come to bring peace and prosperity to your world.
2.  Yes, Earth is our home planet, it is amongst the stars (pointing skyward)
3.  Bestow upon them "commandments."  Rules with which to govern their society.
4.  Copulate with the locals in order to assist them in skipping a link in the evolutionary chain - afterall - they could be valuable trading partners in the future - weve got to bring them up to speed.
5.  Before leaving - we tell them that we will return - they had better be good and follow those rules and if everything goes well, we might just take a few you back to Earth with us.
...Now how is this interperated?  "Strange men that could fly came from the sky one day in their firebreathing carts that made a tremendous thundering noise.  They told us of a wonderful place called Earth, and that "Earth" is watching us - we must follow these rules... if were bad we dont get to go to Earth - and they will be back... we must be good so they will be pleased when they return.  One of our cities was insolent and "Earth" sent fire down to wipe out the infidels.  We build a temple where they landed and we pray to them everyday.  We build statues of them and draw pictures on rock - pictures of strangely dressed humans and even stranger "craft."  We follow the rules because we dont want Earth to be angry at us - Earth will return."

You know what.. its really late and I should be sleeping... I realize I just kinda "stopped" but damnit its hard to think when your tired.  :P  If this topic continues with any amount of interest Ill post more later.

Offline Saurdaukar

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8610
      • Army of Muppets
E vs C
« Reply #265 on: May 05, 2002, 03:15:55 AM »
Oh, before I log:

Remember when we thought the Earth was flat?
Remember when we thought the sun rotated around the Earth?
Remember when we thought stars were "jewels" in fixed positions in a sphere surrounding the Earth?

We think we were created by a supreme being.
We think the universe is deviod of any life other than our own.
We think that we are somehow important in the galactic stream of things.

"Truth" goes through three stages:
1.  It is conjured up by a mad man.
2.  It is hailed as blasphemy.
3.  It is accepted as self-evident.

Something to think about.

Offline Steven

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 681
      • http://members.cox.net/barking.pig/puke.htm
E vs C
« Reply #266 on: May 05, 2002, 12:14:18 PM »
I just discovered this post today and am amazed at the number of postings.  Is this a record or something?  I could only read the first two pages and this last page, but I've enjoyed reading the discerning thoughts.  

Anyway, I know the real truth...Aliens came down in their little flying saucers and zapped some monkies into men.  I've read it and I have faith so I believe.

I forgot who asked, but yes, it was Rene Descartes who coined "Cogito Ergo Sum" or "Cogito me cogitare, ergo sum" which means "I think, therefore I am."  But don't toss all your peanuts into his hat just based on this one statement.  He deals with dreams and discerning reality and even has some fun with a ball of wax.  He's an interesting read.

As for life, I believe Stephen Hawkings said our modern computer virus has all the features that define life.  We ourselves are becoming gods.  We will engineer our own evolution and set out amongst the stars.  In further, I think Hawkings believes we will one day in fact be gone and our engineered creations (machines) will continue beyond us.

There are many faiths and many ancient stories.  Schizophrenia isn't a 20th Century development, but rather has been around I'm certain as long as man could think.   I'm careful where I lay my blind faith.  People do follow...ask Jim Jones or Branch Davidians or even those purple tunicked Nike wearing people waiting for a spaceship.  God gave us the tools to reason, so I think we should do so and some of that reasoning may contradict certain beliefs held very dear and which were handed down for many, many generations.  If there is a God, it is he himself who gave me the ability to reason and conclude his non-existence.

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
E vs C
« Reply #267 on: May 05, 2002, 06:54:18 PM »
Dudes.

You need to separate evolution from abiogenesis.

Evolution is change of allele frequency in a group over time.

Abiogenesis is the scientific theory dealing with the origins of life.

Evolution is one of the more well supported scientific theories out there. Unfortunately, it collides with religious texts belonging to the western world, and is thus hard to swallow for many; indeed, as some religious institutions always has done, they've activelyworked against it.

Evolution isn't just an opinion.

Creationism. What - 30 pages of wildly inaccurate and scientifically impossible statements sold on faith alone? Belonging to yet another religion who claims to have the answer.

The two do not even compare.

I'll give references of proof to anyone who wants it. I expect creationists to return the favour.

Lastly, evolution is notmutually exclusive with religion.  Interpret Genesis as "figure of speech" and you can argue that god created the mechanism of evolution. Even though the 'figure of speech' Bible defense is getting worn.

looking forwardto the day when consensus is that ist is ALL just figure of speech. Ain't that far ahead of us, that day

Offline Kieran

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4119
E vs C
« Reply #268 on: May 05, 2002, 08:59:55 PM »
Quote
looking forwardto the day when consensus is that ist is ALL just figure of speech. Ain't that far ahead of us, that day


So am I. You see, it has been foretold in Revelation (and several other places).

Offline hblair

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4051
      • http://www.cybrtyme.com/personal/hblair/mainpage.htm
E vs C
« Reply #269 on: May 06, 2002, 10:27:52 AM »
I am Convinced! Santas proffessors are extremely educated, and they got these cool textbooks and do these experiments that gotta be right. And besides we have these muscles that cause goosebumps when we get cold, like we're supposed to have fur there! And the skulls! I forgot to mention the skulls they've found from our extinct ancestors. Oh yes, not possible that they were mutations of homo-sapiens. No way.
And all matter was once the size of a tennis ball! This is fact because those proffessors use large words and long equations and besides they all look real smart! Also, what about the Galapogos Islands? They have species not existing on other land masses, that means evolution happened! ~~~ Period!

All this I believe to be true, oops, that requires faith. :(

The theory is fact!