Author Topic: Lookout Bishies an Rookies!  (Read 326 times)

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
lololololol
« Reply #15 on: January 18, 2002, 05:44:37 PM »
Bring it on!

Offline -ammo-

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5124
Lookout Bishies an Rookies!
« Reply #16 on: January 18, 2002, 06:04:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Hangtime
Henh.

Sounds like it's time fer the first massive bish Me262, TA152 and Tempest mission to squash  the Elitist Kniggit buff assault.

I expect we'll even be able to get Laz in on this one.

Suggestion... bish; if it looks like the kniggits are goin fer rookland, swap countries and aid the rooks... vis a vis, rooks; if it looks like bishland is catchin hell, would sure be nice to get some help.

Kill the Elitists!

;)


Hey, doesnt the FDB's  participate in TOD?;)
Commanding Officer, 56 Fighter Group
Retired USAF - 1988 - 2011

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
Lookout Bishies an Rookies!
« Reply #17 on: January 18, 2002, 06:20:15 PM »
This is a call for all rooks and bishops to switch to knight tomorrow night!   What if they threw a war, and no enemy came?   :)

dago
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline Tumor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4272
      • Wait For It
Lookout Bishies an Rookies!
« Reply #18 on: January 18, 2002, 07:13:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dago
This is a call for all rooks and bishops to switch to knight tomorrow night!   What if they threw a war, and no enemy came?   :)

dago


That would be hilarious :D
"Dogfighting is useless"  :Erich Hartmann

Offline jpeg

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 441
      • http://www.steveo.us
Lookout Bishies an Rookies!
« Reply #19 on: January 18, 2002, 07:18:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Seeker
"what exactly do you mean by "having an event""

I think the idea is to promote walk ons in the TOD.

After all, if one gate crashes a party, one can in all fairness only expect the same in return.


TODs dont allow walkons.. i've been debating this for a while now..still no straight answer cept the fact that it causes scoring problems....whatever :rolleyes:

Offline sling322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3510
Lookout Bishies an Rookies!
« Reply #20 on: January 18, 2002, 11:55:20 PM »
Ok jpeg...  You listening now cause I am getting tired of explaining this.  :)

TOD does not allow walkons because of the way the scoring parsers are set up.

You may still fly in the TOD if you wish.  Simply sign up with one of the current squads who are flying in the TOD.  Its that easy.  It wont affect your MA squad affiliation in any way.  If you dont know who you want to fly with contact the CO and request a guest spot.  You can fly with them a couple of weeks and then if you like it get them to add you to the roster permanently.  

Its not that hard.  Some of you out there seem to be trying to make a big deal out of this and its real simple.  If only you spent as much time trying to figure out a way to join in instead of squeaking and moaning about the rules all the time.

Offline aknimitz

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
Lookout Bishies an Rookies!
« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2002, 09:18:15 AM »
Sling, did you just smack his ass!??  IT IS TRUE THE THINGS I HEARD ABOUT YOU!

Man, now I'm gonna have to Check 6 constantly when CM'ing with you.  :eek:

Nim

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Lookout Bishies an Rookies!
« Reply #22 on: January 19, 2002, 09:49:40 AM »
"TOD does not allow walkons because of the way the scoring parsers are set up. "

Why aren't the Scenario parsers used then? (What ever the hell a parser is).

They allow walk-ons.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Lookout Bishies an Rookies!
« Reply #23 on: January 20, 2002, 11:47:46 AM »
so I guess this "event" never happened?
lazs