Yeah, FD, I remember it quite well.
As I recall the major controversy was in a few distinct areas.
1. US troops under UN (non-US) command
2. No clear mission statement/goals
3. Using US combat troops as police with inadequate ROE for that mission
That's what I remember... and YES.. I absolutely opposed deploying US troops anywhere/anytime under those conditions.
So what do you remember about it?
And where's the double standard? I opposed the deployment of troops to Beirut under Reagan for 2 of those 3 items. (Item 1 wasn't a player in Lebanon)
And as far as Bosnia, nothing really changed until the Airwar right?
And that was done WITHOUT a UN resolution to authorize it correct? It was a unilateral action by a US led NATO... is that the way we want to do things?
And in the actual execution it was frighteningly VietNam like in many respects. F-16 Wild Weasles launching WITHOUT their full complement of anti-missile missles because we were OUT of missiles...so they sent them with a minimal load to get the SORTIE COUNT up. Sent F-117's with only ONE 2000 pounder each when they can carry TWO 2k's.. just to get the SORTIE COUNT up.
Yeah.. a double standard... when it SUX, I say it SUX... but then when it SUX, I say it SUX.
