oh no, not again
Although it's difficult to do, it can't be impossible given enough time. Will depend on priorities I assume.
To cut through all this stuff that sounds like everyone is suspicous of the other having hidden agendas, maybe the question should be if you're in favor giving the F8 a few more ordnance options or not. Do not factor in time frame, since that's not something that we should be ultimately deciding. Just a yes, or no and the why part optional (since that's where flames will most likely originate).
I'd say yes, in favor of giving the F8 more options. I was under the impression that they were indeed used in combat.
This is a valid concern, and having each one of these requests turn into pissing contests over perceived knowledge, bias, and "size" doesn't help anyone reading through it. See the other thread in the aircraft and vehicles area also. I personally don't care nation-wise who gets what (even wrt aircraft: P-47N/M fine, Ki-84 fine, Spit XIV fine b/c I fly what I want, everything else is either a target or a friendly). If allied aircraft are missing something be it RAF, RAAF, USAF, USN, VVS, RNZAF, IJAF, etc. then I'd like it to have it someday especially if it increases the effectiveness of the a/c. Napalm, big rockets, big bombs, cbu's, whatever nation. However, if someone from HTC enters the thread and says "no" then the matter should be dropped, period. I don't remember if Pyro or HT came in those earlier threads about the F8 and said "no" or not, but if they did then this should be dropped as a decision has been made.
mauser