Author Topic: Should have bet on womens hockey.  (Read 292 times)

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Should have bet on womens hockey.
« on: February 17, 2002, 02:49:03 AM »
11 - 0

For Canada vs Sweden.  Cripes.  It was like they were playing two different games.  I mean I can understand Sundin vs Joesph, but this?

(Just trying to find something that will get me though a month of Ju88;) ....hey makes a great de-acker:D )

Offline bowser

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 317
Should have bet on womens hockey.
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2002, 10:12:46 AM »
When you get past USA and Canada, the dropoff in skill is huge.  Even 3rd best team, Finland, is way behind.  There were some girls who could hardly skate on Sweden.  A good boy's bantam team could probably beat them.  :)

bowser

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Should have bet on womens hockey.
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2002, 10:25:14 AM »
Bah, we beat you fair and square in a game and what do we get? You start picking on our girls instead...

hehehe

Offline bowser

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 317
Should have bet on womens hockey.
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2002, 06:27:09 PM »
hehe Hortlund...big difference between your men's and women's teams.  No slight intended.  :)

Watching the Sweden/Czech game right now...Sweden looks very good this time around.   They seem to be taking the best advantage of the "no centre red line" rule.

bowser