Author Topic: Kennedy shows on history chanel (Read 1339 times)

fdiron · « **Reply #30 on:** April 16, 2002, 03:24:47 AM »

It was 2 french assassins who came up through mexico that killed Kennedy. They were dressed as policemen. After they shot him they retreated to a safehouse in Texas for a few weeks. Then they returned to France through Canada.

There was a french prisoner who knew of this. In his will he had a clause that his lawyer was to disclose this information upon his death. He feared that if he spoke of the assination he would be killed.

hblair · « **Reply #31 on:** April 16, 2002, 11:58:58 AM »

You guys are going to think I'm crazy, but I'm pretty sure elvis presley played a roll in this thing. My friends aunt knew somebody who was on the police force in Houston, who heard the story from his niece's brother who at one time took a trip to Dallas and heard the story. elvis paid jack ruby to do the shooting, then Oswald had to kill ruby. I hear Oswald is now living in area 51 near Marilyn Monroes house. (she's still alive too, but that's another story)

midnight Target · « **Reply #32 on:** April 16, 2002, 12:14:20 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hangtime
Midnight, I have no inside knowledge outside of the public domain of what actually happened.. and it's a pretty safe bet you ain't on an inside track either.

But, assuming you looked at the same evidence the Warren Commision looked at, and with a clear consience come to the same conclusions.. well; there's a bridge in brooklyn that's still for sale... cheap. Intrested?

if you think one shooter, firing one shot accomplised what Lee Harvey Oswald is credited with... well; nevermind.

One shot?...No, it was 3 shots. And I don't wanna buy your bridge, you can keep it under your name.

If any of you were to look at the "EVIDENCE" not the speculation and hearsay, then the most logical conclusion is Oswald. This is not to say that there could not have been a conpiracy. But you cannot prove a negative, so I will go with the evidence.

Point out something that contradicts the one shooter - in the book depository theory, and I will be happy to reply. Don't need an inside track, just an open mind. For instance, was there something in the list of "myterious deaths" I posted you disagree with?

midnight Target · « **Reply #33 on:** April 16, 2002, 12:42:52 PM »

Check this out computer animation of assasination used for the "mock trial" of Oswald in 1992.

Sikboy · « **Reply #34 on:** April 16, 2002, 01:07:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by hblair
You guys are going to think I'm crazy, but I'm pretty sure elvis presley played a roll in this thing. My friends aunt knew somebody who was on the police force in Houston, who heard the story from his niece's brother who at one time took a trip to Dallas and heard the story. elvis paid jack ruby to do the shooting, then Oswald had to kill ruby. I hear Oswald is now living in area 51 near Marilyn Monroes house. (she's still alive too, but that's another story)

Did you check out my link hblair? Very telling information.

-Sikboy

mietla · « **Reply #35 on:** April 16, 2002, 01:13:01 PM »

Never saw a man being shot in a head, but the third and fatal shot sure looked like coming from the right front (I'm talking about the movie). It looks like his head goes vilolently back and top of his head is blown off to the rear. Jackie climbs back on a trunk to retrieve it.

As I said, just an opinion, but I know physics. I'm not buing the shot from the rear.

The fact that Oswald was shooting, does not mean that he was a the only shooter, not that he was a killer.

mietla · « **Reply #36 on:** April 16, 2002, 01:13:57 PM »

BTW, wasn't this a 22 cal?

Is it possible to do so much damage with a 22 cal at 200 yards?

hblair · « **Reply #37 on:** April 16, 2002, 01:19:48 PM »

No way a .22 would do that.

Eagler · « **Reply #38 on:** April 16, 2002, 02:05:20 PM »

actually it was 10 shots but with the lag in the area at the time it only looked like 3 hits

-dead- · « **Reply #39 on:** April 16, 2002, 02:59:36 PM »

Reckon the Warren Commission need to tweak the Carcano - seems a bit overmodelled to me:
CE 399 (The magic bullet) caused 7 wounds, went through 2 humans, possibly fractured a vertebra, destroyed 10cm of rib, shattered a wrist, then emerged with virtually no weight loss (1/180 of an ounce) while leaving significant fragments in one of the victims. And ends up Pristine & undeformed.

A 6.5 mm bullet worse than any AH .50 cal!

midnight Target · « **Reply #40 on:** April 16, 2002, 03:02:01 PM »

Quote

Never saw a man being shot in a head, but the third and fatal shot sure looked like coming from the right front (I'm talking about the movie). It looks like his head goes vilolently back and top of his head is blown off to the rear. Jackie climbs back on a trunk to retrieve it.

Here is a link to still pictures of the head shot from the rear. I would post the pics, but some may find them disturbing.

Samm · « **Reply #41 on:** April 16, 2002, 03:04:11 PM »

I propose no theories but, it is obvious that it was more than one bullet . It is even clear on the film that there are multiple bullet strikes . And if the official report deliberately makes this lie that it was only one bullet, one has to ask the question why . There is a motive somewhere .

midnight Target · « **Reply #42 on:** April 16, 2002, 03:37:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by -dead-
Reckon the Warren Commission need to tweak the Carcano - seems a bit overmodelled to me:
CE 399 (The magic bullet) caused 7 wounds, went through 2 humans, possibly fractured a vertebra, destroyed 10cm of rib, shattered a wrist, then emerged with virtually no weight loss (1/180 of an ounce) while leaving significant fragments in one of the victims. And ends up Pristine & undeformed.

A 6.5 mm bullet worse than any AH .50 cal!

Sorry dead, but you are misinformed as well. here is the pic of the "pristine bullet" that never makes it into the conspiracy books.

midnight Target · « **Reply #43 on:** April 16, 2002, 03:38:42 PM »

here is the view the conspracy books will show you....

Samm · « **Reply #44 on:** April 16, 2002, 03:45:57 PM »

Neither of them look like they've been fired through a body .

Anyone who has recovered a full jacketed bullet that was fired into a deer can relate .