I have problems to understand some discourses.
Because an osti shoot down you, you must fly low.
If you fly low he is because:
a) You are in take-off
b) You are vulching a field
c) You are attaching a GV
I would want so much understand:
in the a case) what do you change, if to shoot down you is it an airplane instead that an osti?
in the b case) where is the ability of pilotage in the kill airplanes that are in take-off and could not they defend?
in the c case) you mistake manoeuvre or you don't use an efficient tactic, perhaps a period in TA to learn the attack to the GVs is advisable.
The new grounds already create not few problems to the GVs, they are full of obstacles that prevent to the GV of maneuver, but they are useless for take refuge from the aerial attacks, any hills are too steep and could not be scaled with l'M16 or with l'M3 or l'M8, only the Pzr and the Osti are able to cross it.
The dispersion of the gun of the osti is ashamed if compared to that of many fighter.
But that do you want? what the GV could not they defend or could not they defend a field?
Is the arena full of obstacles for the GVs, frisia horses, trees, holes, rock, there provided that them could not they maneuver nimbly for avoid the bombs and that could not they hide in the vegetation?
Why don't you ask to HT of put locks and disarmed GVs scattered in arena?
As the heroic vulchers could enjoy without run risks.
But to you, cost so much take a bomb and learn to drop it on a GV?
"[the idiots that are incapable of killing a plane in another plane to get kills. " Yeeessssss !!!! he is true !!!! kill an airplane while take off is a radiant example of big ability. ROTFL !
Guy, you are pathetic
Maxo